Steve,
I discovered a few more files that are being mistakenly omitted when
using the dist target.
John
Only in b/audit-1.5.6: ab.diff
Only in b/audit-1.5.6: ac.diff
Only in b/audit-1.5.6: aclocal.m4
Only in b/audit-1.5.6/audisp: Makefile
Only in b/audit-1.5.6/audisp: Makefile.in
Only in b/audit
On Sunday 29 July 2007 11:02:33 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> They are still completely unused, but hopefully some of the theoretical
> code that might use it will appear in the kernel in the near future...
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Steve Grubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 09:18:41AM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Sunday 29 July 2007 11:02:33 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > They are still completely unused, but hopefully some of the theoretical
> > code that might use it will appear in the kernel in the near future...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk
What is the rationale behind the selinux_audit_set_callback()
mechanism? It looks for all the world as if the selinux code
ought to be able to call the registered function directly.
Casey Schaufler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailm
Hello,
John D. Ramsdell napsal(a):
> diff -ur a/audit-1.5.6/Makefile.am b/audit-1.5.6/Makefile.am
> --- a/audit-1.5.6/Makefile.am 2007-06-27 06:19:18.0 -0400
> +++ b/audit-1.5.6/Makefile.am 2007-07-30 07:53:45.0 -0400
> @@ -21,9 +21,14 @@
> # Rickard E. (Rik) Faith <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 07:24 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> What is the rationale behind the selinux_audit_set_callback()
> mechanism? It looks for all the world as if the selinux code
> ought to be able to call the registered function directly.
Looks like it is a legacy of when the callback was a
Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> system-config-audit.lang is generated by %install when building the rpm,
> and should not be in the tarball at all.
...
> A better solution is to change s-c-audit/autogen.sh (and to distribute
> the autogen.sh files):
I changed audit/system-config-
John D. Ramsdell napsal(a):
> I changed audit/system-config-audit/autogen.sh as you suggested, but
> the tarball created with "make dist" contains no .m4 files.
Have you executed the new autogen.sh? What automake version to you use?
Mirek
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have you executed the new autogen.sh?
Between changes, I've been performing:
$ aclocal && autoconf && autoheader && automake
$ ./configure
$ make dist
The first line is from audit.spec, so I assume it is correct.
> What automake version to you use?
John D. Ramsdell napsal(a):
> Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Have you executed the new autogen.sh?
>
> Between changes, I've been performing:
>
> $ aclocal && autoconf && autoheader && automake
> $ ./configure
> $ make dist
>
> The first line is from audit.spec, so I assume it
Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Use the top-level autogen.sh instead, please.
This worked, and I notice that with the changes to
system-config-audit/autogen.sh you suggested earlier, fewer M4 files
are placed in the distribution. I also notice quite a few warning
messages.
[EMAIL P
John D. Ramsdell napsal(a):
> Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Use the top-level autogen.sh instead, please.
>
> This worked, and I notice that with the changes to
> system-config-audit/autogen.sh you suggested earlier, fewer M4 files
> are placed in the distribution.
That is expected
Miloslav Trmac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Use the top-level autogen.sh instead, please.
I think I've gotten myself in over my head. I tried to create a new
dist target fixes patch, but the patch is huge. Running the top-level
autogen.sh results in differences in a large number of derived fil
13 matches
Mail list logo
