Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix a bug that use option '-r' cannot output all unformatted logs

2008-08-15 Thread Steve Grubb
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 21:06:45 Peng Haitao wrote: > When the watched file is deleted or renamed, the log will be made. > You can get the result by following steps: > > 1. # service auditd start > 2. # touch temp_file > 3. # auditctl -w `pwd`/temp_file -k temp_file > 4. # rm -f temp_file > > /var/

Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields

2008-08-15 Thread Matteo Michelini
2008/8/15, Steve Grubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 15 August 2008 09:58:54 Matteo Michelini wrote: >> I'm working on a binary format for the linux-audit system as part of a >> university research project. > > Big-endian/little-endian in aggregated logs? Will the kernel authors allow > the > en

Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields

2008-08-15 Thread Stephen Smalley
On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 15:58 +0200, Matteo Michelini wrote: > I'm working on a binary format for the linux-audit system as part of a > university research project. > > The goal is having something similar to BSM trails. > What do you think about it? If your question is whether we would be ok with

Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields

2008-08-15 Thread Steve Grubb
On Friday 15 August 2008 09:58:54 Matteo Michelini wrote: > I'm working on a binary format for the linux-audit system as part of a > university research project. Big-endian/little-endian in aggregated logs? Will the kernel authors allow the encoder in the kernel? XDR was the only option we had la

Re: get_field_str() and interpret_field() bug with multi-word fields

2008-08-15 Thread Matteo Michelini
I'm working on a binary format for the linux-audit system as part of a university research project. The goal is having something similar to BSM trails. What do you think about it? 2008/8/14, Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:25 -0300, Klaus Heinrich Kiwi wrote: >>

Re: Audit for live supervision

2008-08-15 Thread Steve Grubb
On Friday 15 August 2008 02:43:49 Kay Hayen wrote: > More importantly, and somewhat blocking my tests: With the improved rules I > get this when compiling quite well reproducible: > > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1218773075.500:118620): arch=c03e syscall=59 > success=yes exit=0 a0=7fff6f78cf90 a1=7ff