Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] audit by executable name

2015-05-29 Thread Richard Guy Briggs
On 15/05/29, Peter Moody wrote: Did this [1] land? I'm guessing no because the next pull request from Eric Paris didn't include it and I don't see it referenced in any of Paul's pull requests. Finally (most tellingly), I don't see anything in Linus' tree. Why? Were your ears burning? ;-)

Re: [PATCH V5 0/5] audit by executable name

2015-05-29 Thread Paul Moore
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Peter Moody pe...@hda3.com wrote: Did this [1] land? I'm guessing no because the next pull request from Eric Paris didn't include it and I don't see it referenced in any of Paul's pull requests. Finally (most tellingly), I don't see anything in Linus' tree.

Re: [PATCH] kernel:audit - Fix for typo in comment to function audit_log_link_denied().

2015-05-29 Thread Paul Moore
On Saturday, May 23, 2015 10:40:27 AM Shailendra Verma wrote: Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma shailendra.capric...@gmail.com --- kernel/audit.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Applied, thanks. diff --git a/kernel/audit.c b/kernel/audit.c index 1c13e42..f9e6065

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Obsolete check is now removed.

2015-05-29 Thread Paul Moore
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015 04:41:05 PM Mikhail Klementyev wrote: From a2e33ce7c9b5ceff2a8b570b570ddd0023ce077f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mikhail Klementyevjollh...@riseup.net Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 23:20:38 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Obsolete check is now removed. Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] lsm: rename duplicate labels in LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK audit message type

2015-05-29 Thread Paul Moore
On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 02:08:25 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: The LSM_AUDIT_DATA_TASK pid= and comm= labels are duplicates of those at the start of this function with different values. Rename them to their object counterparts opid= and ocomm= to disambiguate. Signed-off-by: Richard Guy