On 2019-06-18 18:12, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:24 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > Hello Paul,
> >
> > I am curious about this. We seemed to be close to getting this patch pulled
> > in. A lot of people are waiting for it. Can you summarize what you think the
> > patches need and who w
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:24 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> I am curious about this. We seemed to be close to getting this patch pulled
> in. A lot of people are waiting for it. Can you summarize what you think the
> patches need and who we think needs to do it? I'm lost. Does LXC people n
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 11:59:05 AM EDT Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS) wrote:
> Maybe what Philippe means is a carefully tested auditd shouldn't be
> considered "alpha" anymore?
That's a fair point. :-)
I've considered it Alpha because it's missing container support. IOW, it's
not feature complete
Maybe what Philippe means is a carefully tested auditd shouldn't be considered
"alpha" anymore?
-Original Message-
From: linux-audit-boun...@redhat.com On Behalf
Of Steve Grubb
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 10:36 AM
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: MAUPERTUIS, PHILIPPE
Subject: EXT :Re: a
Hello Philippe,
On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 9:34:08 AM EDT MAUPERTUIS, PHILIPPE wrote:
> On the mailing list a few days ago, it was announce that Audit-3.0 alpha8
> was available. I am a little bit confused because on a RHEL 8 server I get
> :
> rpm -q audit
> audit-3.0-0.10.20180831git0047a6c.el8.
Hi,
On the mailing list a few days ago, it was announce that Audit-3.0 alpha8 was
available.
I am a little bit confused because on a RHEL 8 server I get :
rpm -q audit
audit-3.0-0.10.20180831git0047a6c.el8.x86_64
What are the link between the Rhel 8 rpm and the version audit-3.0 announced.
I can'
