On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:51 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:03:20 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Also, for the record, removing the audit loginuid from procfs is not
> > > something to take lightly, if at all; like it or not, it's part of the
> > > kernel API.
>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:40 PM Chris Mason wrote:
> Dave Jones reported that we're finding a considerable amount of dmesg
> traffic from NTP time adjustments being reported through the audit
> subsystem. His original post is here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190923155041.ga14...@codemonk
Dave Jones reported that we're finding a considerable amount of dmesg
traffic from NTP time adjustments being reported through the audit
subsystem. His original post is here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190923155041.ga14...@codemonkey.org.uk/
The confusing part is that we're seeing this on ma
Hello,
TLDR; I see a lot of benefit to switching away from procfs for setting auid &
sessionid.
On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 6:03:20 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > Also, for the record, removing the audit loginuid from procfs is not
> > something to take lightly, if at all; like it or n
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:04 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 2019-10-30 16:27, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 5:00 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > Here's the note I had from that meeting:
> > >
> > > - Eric raised the issue that using /proc is likely to get more and more
> > >
