The pull request you sent on Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:52:12 -0400:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/audit.git
> tags/audit-pr-20220801
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/f42e1e3e40da02924e29987c5b721c0932d9b380
Thank you!
--
Deet-doot-d
I would like very much to get v38 or v39 of the LSM stacking for Apparmor
patch set in the LSM next branch for 6.1. The audit changes have polished
up nicely and I believe that all comments on the integrity code have been
addressed. The interface_lsm mechanism has been beaten to a frothy peak.
Ther
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:01 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> I would like very much to get v38 or v39 of the LSM stacking for Apparmor
> patch set in the LSM next branch for 6.1. The audit changes have polished
> up nicely and I believe that all comments on the integrity code have been
> addressed. The
On 8/2/2022 5:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:01 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
>> I would like very much to get v38 or v39 of the LSM stacking for Apparmor
>> patch set in the LSM next branch for 6.1. The audit changes have polished
>> up nicely and I believe that all comments on t
On 8/2/22 17:56, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:01 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
I would like very much to get v38 or v39 of the LSM stacking for Apparmor
patch set in the LSM next branch for 6.1. The audit changes have polished
up nicely and I believe that all comments on the integrity
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 10:15 PM Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 8/2/2022 5:56 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 8:01 PM Casey Schaufler
> > wrote:
> >> I would like very much to get v38 or v39 of the LSM stacking for Apparmor
> >> patch set in the LSM next branch for 6.1. The audit ch
On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:56:21 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> I can tell you that I've never been really excited about the /proc
> changes, and believe it or not I've been thinking about those a fair
> amount since James asked me to start maintaining the LSM.
Why do we not have auid and session
On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 10:34 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 8:56:21 PM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> > I can tell you that I've never been really excited about the /proc
> > changes, and believe it or not I've been thinking about those a fair
> > amount since James asked me to sta
