Hello,
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:12:51PM +, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> Do you want me to resend or could you modify the patch while applying?
Can you please send the updated patch?
Thanks!
--
tejun
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:19:00PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
Hello,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:19:01PM +0200, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> @@ -134,10 +135,13 @@ static inline void put_css_set(struct css_set *cset)
>* can see it. Similar to atomic_dec_and_lock(), but for an
>* rwlock
>*/
> - if (atomic_add_unless(&cset->refcount, -1,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 07:47:44PM +, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> It's really critical to be able to associate a task in the logs to
> cgroups which were valid that time. Or can we infer somehow what cgroups
When is "that time"? Without logging all operations, this is
meaningless.
> a task was t
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:14:31PM +0300, Topi Miettinen wrote:
> [ 28.443674] audit: type=1327 audit(1468234333.144:520):
> proctitle=6D6B6E6F64002F6465762F7A5F343639006300310032
> [ 28.465888] audit: type=1330 audit(1468234333.144:520):
> cap_used=0800
> [ 28.482080] a
