On Thursday 20 December 2007 3:00:09 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
>
> > The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
> > trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
> >
From: Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:29:31 -0500
> The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
> trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
> merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit
The following patch is backed against David's net-2.6 tree and is pretty
trivial. I know we're late in the 2.6.24 cycle but I think this is worth
merging, if you guys don't feel that way let me know and I'll resubmit it
for 2.6.25.
As a side note, I'm unable to actually test the patch because I c
