On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 16/04/22, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> 2. The existing usage is always tsk==current
>
> My understanding is that when it is called via:
>
> copy_process()
> audit_free()
> __audit_free()
>
On 04/28/2016 12:28 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 16/04/27, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 04/27/2016 06:31 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>> On 16/04/22, Peter Hurley wrote:
On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
>
>
On 16/04/27, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 04/27/2016 06:31 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > On 16/04/22, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >> On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>> The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
> >>>
> >>> Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(
On 04/27/2016 06:31 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 16/04/22, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>> The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
>>>
>>> Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
>>> replace the call in audit_
On 16/04/22, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
> >
> > Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> > replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
> > audit_log_set_l
On 04/26/2016 03:34 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Peter Hurley
> wrote:
>> On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>>> index b40ed5d..32cdafb 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
>>> +++ b/includ
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>> index b40ed5d..32cdafb 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include
>
On 04/21/2016 11:14 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
>
> Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
> audit_log_set_loginuid(). Lock and bump the kref to protect
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:50 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 16/04/21, Paul Moore wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>> > The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
>> >
>> > Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
>> > rep
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 09:29:57 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
> >
> > Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> > replace the call in audit_log_task_info() a
On 16/04/21, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
> >
> > Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> > replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
> > audit_lo
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
>
> Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
> replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
> audit_log_set_loginuid(). Lock and bump the kref t
The tty field was missing from AUDIT_LOGIN events.
Refactor code to create a new function audit_get_tty(), using it to
replace the call in audit_log_task_info() and to add it to
audit_log_set_loginuid(). Lock and bump the kref to protect it, adding
audit_put_tty() alias to decrement it.
Signed-o
13 matches
Mail list logo