On 15/05/29, Peter Moody wrote:
Did this [1] land? I'm guessing no because the next pull request from
Eric Paris didn't include it and I don't see it referenced in any of
Paul's pull requests. Finally (most tellingly), I don't see anything
in Linus' tree.
Why? Were your ears burning? ;-)
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Peter Moody pe...@hda3.com wrote:
Did this [1] land? I'm guessing no because the next pull request from
Eric Paris didn't include it and I don't see it referenced in any of
Paul's pull requests. Finally (most tellingly), I don't see anything
in Linus' tree.
On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote:
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 06:19:52 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:56 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
* Change the audit_status.version field comment in
include/uapi/linux/audit.h to /* audit functionality bitmap */, or
similar. We can't really
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 03:48:40 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote:
Can anyone think of anything else that might be affected by this?
No one uses this stuff, just change it.
Yes, but I feel like I need to at least ask the question; how much
On 14/10/29, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 03:48:40 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote:
Can anyone think of anything else that might be affected by this?
No one uses this stuff, just change it.
Yes, but I feel like I need to at
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 17:54 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/29, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 03:48:40 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote:
Can anyone think of anything else that might be affected by this?
No one uses this
On 14/10/29, Eric Paris wrote:
On Wed, 2014-10-29 at 17:54 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/29, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 03:48:40 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On 14/10/21, Paul Moore wrote:
Can anyone think of anything else that might be affected
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:33:39 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:02:33 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 06:47:27 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 16:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:06:51 PM Richard Guy
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 05:56:36 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:33:39 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:02:33 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 06:47:27 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 16:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:56 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
* Change the audit_status.version field comment in include/uapi/linux/audit.h
to /* audit functionality bitmap */, or similar. We can't really change
the
structure now, but the comment is fair game.
Trying to think how to do things
On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 06:19:52 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:56 -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
* Change the audit_status.version field comment in
include/uapi/linux/audit.h to /* audit functionality bitmap */, or
similar. We can't really change the structure now, but the
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:06:51 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
This is a part of Peter Moody, my and Eric Paris' work to implement
audit by executable name.
Does this patch set define an AUDIT_VERSION_SOMETHING and then set
AUDIT_VERSION_LATEST to it? If not, I need one to tell if the
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 16:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:06:51 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
This is a part of Peter Moody, my and Eric Paris' work to implement
audit by executable name.
Does this patch set define an AUDIT_VERSION_SOMETHING and then set
On Monday, October 20, 2014 06:47:27 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 16:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:06:51 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
This is a part of Peter Moody, my and Eric Paris' work to implement
audit by executable name.
Does this
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:33:39 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 07:02:33 PM Paul Moore wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 06:47:27 PM Eric Paris wrote:
On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 16:25 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Thursday, October 02, 2014 11:06:51 PM Richard Guy
This is a part of Peter Moody, my and Eric Paris' work to implement
audit by executable name.
Please see the accompanying userspace patch:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2014-May/msg00019.html
The userspace interface is not expected to change appreciably unless something
16 matches
Mail list logo
