RE: [Patch]Fix the bug of using -S syscall -a list, action, no errors will be reported.

2008-08-06 Thread Chu Li
Hi Steve, When I use -a user,always -S open, errors will be reported. But when I use -S open -a user,always, no errors will report. There is no corresponding codes to deal with the later format. I'm still thinking about this patch. I'll look at it again tomorrow. I modified the

RE: [Patch]Fix the bug of using -S syscall -a list, action, no errors will be reported.

2008-08-06 Thread Chu Li
Hi Steve, When I use -a user,always -S open, errors will be reported. But when I use -S open -a user,always, no errors will report. There is no corresponding codes to deal with the later format. I'm still thinking about this patch. I'll look at it again tomorrow. I modified the

Re: [Patch]Fix the bug of using -S syscall -a list, action, no errors will be reported.

2008-08-06 Thread Steve Grubb
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 03:27:00 Chu Li wrote:  And I found another problem, when using -a 'list','action' -w /mnt, it will always add the rule LIST_RULES: exit,always dir=/mnt (0x4) perm=rwxa. I found -w will use the exit list automatically. I think it's better to add something about it

Re: [Patch]Fix the bug of using -S syscall -a list, action, no errors will be reported.

2008-08-04 Thread Steve Grubb
Hi, On Wednesday 30 July 2008 21:38:26 chuli wrote: When I use -a user,always -S open, errors will be reported. But when I use -S open -a user,always, no errors will report. There is no corresponding codes to deal with the later format. I'm still thinking about this patch. I'll look at it

[Patch]Fix the bug of using -S syscall -a list, action, no errors will be reported.

2008-07-30 Thread chuli
Hi Steve, When I use -a user,always -S open, errors will be reported. But when I use -S open -a user,always, no errors will report. There is no corresponding codes to deal with the later format. Here is my patch. Hope for your opinion about such modification. (I move the code for checking