Quoting Mimi Zohar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> We are interested in using auditing's context pathname information.
> Is this the best way of accessing it?
>
> Add support for accessing auditing's inode full pathname.
Interesting idea. It does seem to do what you need.
-serge
> Signed-off-by: Mimi
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 10:36:46 Mimi Zohar wrote:
> We are interested in using auditing's context pathname information.
> Is this the best way of accessing it?
>
> Add support for accessing auditing's inode full pathname.
What would this be used for? Al could you comment on this? Would ther
On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 19:47 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2008 10:36:46 Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > We are interested in using auditing's context pathname information.
> > Is this the best way of accessing it?
> >
> > Add support for accessing auditing's inode full pathname.
>
> W
