Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-02-19 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little > sloppy when it comes to using task credentials, mixing both the > subjective and object credentials. This patch set attempts to fix > this by replacing security_task_getsecid() with two

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-02-20 Thread Paul Moore
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little > > sloppy when it comes to using task credentials, mixing both the > > subjective and object credentials. This patch set attemp

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-02-22 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 2/20/2021 6:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler > wrote: >> On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little >>> sloppy when it comes to using task credentials, mixing both the >>> subjective

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-02-23 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 15:58 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 2/20/2021 6:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler > > wrote: > >> On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > >>> As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little > >>> sloppy wh

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-02-23 Thread Paul Moore
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:14 AM Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 15:58 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > On 2/20/2021 6:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler > > > wrote: > > >> On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > >>> As discussed briefly

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-03-03 Thread Paul Moore
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:59 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 2/20/2021 6:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler > > wrote: > >> On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > >>> As discussed briefly on the list (lore link below), we are a little > >>> sloppy when

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-03-03 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 3/3/2021 4:46 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:59 PM Casey Schaufler > wrote: >> On 2/20/2021 6:41 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 8:49 PM Casey Schaufler >>> wrote: On 2/19/2021 3:28 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > As discussed briefly on the list (lore l

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Split security_task_getsecid() into subj and obj variants

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Moore
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 9:21 PM Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 3/3/2021 4:46 PM, Paul Moore wrote: ... > > Assuming you are still good with these changes Casey, any chance I can > > get an ACK on the LSM and Smack patches? > > Yes. You can add my: > > Acked-by: Casey Schaufler > > to both. Done, t