Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM ATTEND AND AGENDA TOPIC] request to attend the summit

2017-01-03 Thread Jan Kara
On Tue 03-01-17 18:23:17, Paolo Valente wrote: > > > Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 13:00, Bart Van Assche > > ha scritto: > > > > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:39 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> In this respect, I hope that the committee does not meet too soon. > > >

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] OCSSDs - SMR, Hierarchical Interface, and Vector I/Os

2017-01-03 Thread Damien Le Moal
Slava, On 1/4/17 11:59, Slava Dubeyko wrote: > What's the goal of SMR compatibility? Any unification or interface > abstraction has the goal to hide the peculiarities of underlying > hardware. But we have block device abstraction that hides all > hardware's peculiarities perfectly. Also FTL (or

RE: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] OCSSDs - SMR, Hierarchical Interface, and Vector I/Os

2017-01-03 Thread Slava Dubeyko
-Original Message- From: Matias Bjørling [mailto:m...@bjorling.me] Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 11:11 AM To: Viacheslav Dubeyko ; lsf...@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: Linux FS Devel ; linux-block@vger.kernel.org;

Re: [patch] block: fix up io_poll documentation

2017-01-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On 01/03/2017 03:51 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > /sys/block//queue/io_poll is a boolean. Fix the docs. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer > > diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt > b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt > index 5164215..c0a3bb5 100644 > ---

[patch] block: fix up io_poll documentation

2017-01-03 Thread Jeff Moyer
/sys/block//queue/io_poll is a boolean. Fix the docs. Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt index 5164215..c0a3bb5 100644 --- a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt +++

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] OCSSDs - SMR, Hierarchical Interface, and Vector I/Os

2017-01-03 Thread Matias Bjørling
On 01/03/2017 06:35 PM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: Hi Matias, On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 09:56 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: Hi, The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are

Re: [PATCH PoCv2 1/2] Revert "mmc: queue: Share mmc request array between partitions"

2017-01-03 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:30:17PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > Shared mmc queue changes break mmc-mq ones currently. > > This reverts commit 6540ce8420b7790ef0696ccfd6e911df7ba84c33. > > Conflicts: > drivers/mmc/core/queue.c Why are these lines in your changelog? Please

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] OCSSDs - SMR, Hierarchical Interface, and Vector I/Os

2017-01-03 Thread Viacheslav Dubeyko
Hi Matias, On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 09:56 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: > On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are > > > beginning > >

[PATCH PoCv2 0/2] mmc: add blk-mq support

2017-01-03 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Hi, It prints a lot of scheduling while atomic warnings during boot, lacks error handling and is otherwise incomplete but boots successully on my Odroid-XU3 board. I hope that it is useful to somebody. The differences between these patches and Linus' RFD patch: - request completion is handled

[PATCH PoCv2 2/2] mmc-mq: initial blk-mq support

2017-01-03 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz --- drivers/mmc/core/block.c| 104 -- drivers/mmc/core/block.h| 3 +- drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +- drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 120

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND AND AGENDA TOPIC] request to attend the summit

2017-01-03 Thread Paolo Valente
> Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 13:00, Bart Van Assche > ha scritto: > > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:39 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: >> In this respect, I hope that the committee does not meet too soon. > > Hello Paolo, > Hi > I don't know when the program

Re: [PATCH v1 12/54] dm: limit the max bio size as BIO_MAX_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE

2017-01-03 Thread Mike Snitzer
On Tue, Dec 27 2016 at 10:56am -0500, Ming Lei wrote: > For BIO based DM, some targets aren't ready for dealing with > bigger incoming bio than 1Mbyte, such as crypt target. > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei > --- > drivers/md/dm.c | 11 ++- > 1

Re: [PATCH v1 45/54] exofs: convert to bio_for_each_segment_all_sp()

2017-01-03 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On 12/27/2016 06:04 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei Cool ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh > --- > fs/exofs/ore.c | 3 ++- > fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore.c

Re: [PATCH v2] RFD: switch MMC/SD to use blk-mq multiqueueing

2017-01-03 Thread Linus Walleij
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > b) without MMC CMDQ support: > - report queue depth of '2' > - first request gets handled as above > - if one request is pending, prepare the second request and > add a pointer to the mmc host structure (not that

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND AND AGENDA TOPIC] request to attend the summit

2017-01-03 Thread Paolo Valente
> Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 09:17, Bart Van Assche > ha scritto: > > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 19:14 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: >> This is to retry to request to attend the summit. This time I'm >> trying to propose and agenda topic too. >> >> I would like to

Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] OCSSDs - SMR, Hierarchical Interface, and Vector I/Os

2017-01-03 Thread Matias Bjørling
On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are beginning >> to >> become available on the market. > > What do you mean? We still have nothing on the market. I

Re: [LSF/MM ATTEND AND AGENDA TOPIC] request to attend the summit

2017-01-03 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 19:14 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote: > This is to retry to request to attend the summit. This time I'm > trying to propose and agenda topic too. > > I would like to attend, and propose a topic, because: > 1) the project for adding (only) the BFQ I/O scheduler to blk-mq has >