On Tue 03-01-17 18:23:17, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
> > Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 13:00, Bart Van Assche
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:39 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> >> In this respect, I hope that the committee does not meet too soon.
> >
>
Slava,
On 1/4/17 11:59, Slava Dubeyko wrote:
> What's the goal of SMR compatibility? Any unification or interface
> abstraction has the goal to hide the peculiarities of underlying
> hardware. But we have block device abstraction that hides all
> hardware's peculiarities perfectly. Also FTL (or
-Original Message-
From: Matias Bjørling [mailto:m...@bjorling.me]
Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 11:11 AM
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko ; lsf...@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Linux FS Devel ;
linux-block@vger.kernel.org;
On 01/03/2017 03:51 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> /sys/block//queue/io_poll is a boolean. Fix the docs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
> b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
> index 5164215..c0a3bb5 100644
> ---
/sys/block//queue/io_poll is a boolean. Fix the docs.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer
diff --git a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
b/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
index 5164215..c0a3bb5 100644
--- a/Documentation/block/queue-sysfs.txt
+++
On 01/03/2017 06:35 PM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
Hi Matias,
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 09:56 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
Hi,
The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:30:17PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Shared mmc queue changes break mmc-mq ones currently.
>
> This reverts commit 6540ce8420b7790ef0696ccfd6e911df7ba84c33.
>
> Conflicts:
> drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
Why are these lines in your changelog?
Please
Hi Matias,
On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 09:56 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are
> > > beginning
> >
Hi,
It prints a lot of scheduling while atomic warnings during
boot, lacks error handling and is otherwise incomplete but
boots successully on my Odroid-XU3 board. I hope that it
is useful to somebody.
The differences between these patches and Linus' RFD patch:
- request completion is handled
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
---
drivers/mmc/core/block.c| 104 --
drivers/mmc/core/block.h| 3 +-
drivers/mmc/core/bus.c | 3 +-
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 120
> Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 13:00, Bart Van Assche
> ha scritto:
>
> On Tue, 2017-01-03 at 10:39 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> In this respect, I hope that the committee does not meet too soon.
>
> Hello Paolo,
>
Hi
> I don't know when the program
On Tue, Dec 27 2016 at 10:56am -0500,
Ming Lei wrote:
> For BIO based DM, some targets aren't ready for dealing with
> bigger incoming bio than 1Mbyte, such as crypt target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
> ---
> drivers/md/dm.c | 11 ++-
> 1
On 12/27/2016 06:04 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
Cool
ACK-by: Boaz Harrosh
> ---
> fs/exofs/ore.c | 3 ++-
> fs/exofs/ore_raid.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/exofs/ore.c
On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> b) without MMC CMDQ support:
> - report queue depth of '2'
> - first request gets handled as above
> - if one request is pending, prepare the second request and
> add a pointer to the mmc host structure (not that
> Il giorno 03 gen 2017, alle ore 09:17, Bart Van Assche
> ha scritto:
>
> On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 19:14 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> This is to retry to request to attend the summit. This time I'm
>> trying to propose and agenda topic too.
>>
>> I would like to
On 01/03/2017 12:12 AM, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 22:06 +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The open-channel SSD subsystem is maturing, and drives are beginning
>> to
>> become available on the market.
>
> What do you mean? We still have nothing on the market. I
On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 19:14 +0100, Paolo Valente wrote:
> This is to retry to request to attend the summit. This time I'm
> trying to propose and agenda topic too.
>
> I would like to attend, and propose a topic, because:
> 1) the project for adding (only) the BFQ I/O scheduler to blk-mq has
>
17 matches
Mail list logo