Re: [PATCH] blk-mq-debugfs: Also show requests that have not yet been started

2018-10-04 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 10/4/18 7:35 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: When debugging e.g. the SCSI timeout handler it is important that requests that have not yet been started or that already have completed are also reported through debugfs. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ming Lei Cc: Hannes

[PATCH] lightnvm: consider max hw sectors supported for max_write_pgs

2018-10-04 Thread Zhoujie Wu
When do GC, the number of read/write sectors are determined by max_write_pgs(see gc_rq preparation in pblk_gc_line_prepare_ws). Due to max_write_pgs doesn't consider max hw sectors supported by nvme controller(128K), which leads to GC tries to read 64 * 4K in one command, and see below error

[PATCH] blk-mq-debugfs: Also show requests that have not yet been started

2018-10-04 Thread Bart Van Assche
When debugging e.g. the SCSI timeout handler it is important that requests that have not yet been started or that already have completed are also reported through debugfs. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Ming Lei Cc: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Martin

Re: Why BFQ scheduler available only for NVMe device?

2018-10-04 Thread Jens Axboe
On 10/4/18 10:15 AM, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: > Sorry I don't finded answer on my question. > Why BFQ scheduler available only for NVMe device? > > $ find /sys -name scheduler -exec grep . {} + > find: ‘/sys/kernel/debug’: Permission denied > find: ‘/sys/fs/pstore’: Permission denied > find:

Why BFQ scheduler available only for NVMe device?

2018-10-04 Thread Mikhail Gavrilov
Sorry I don't finded answer on my question. Why BFQ scheduler available only for NVMe device? $ find /sys -name scheduler -exec grep . {} + find: ‘/sys/kernel/debug’: Permission denied find: ‘/sys/fs/pstore’: Permission denied find: ‘/sys/fs/bpf’: Permission denied

Re: [PATCH 0/14] loop: Fix oops and possible deadlocks

2018-10-04 Thread Jan Kara
On Thu 27-09-18 23:47:01, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > Possible changes folded into this series. Thanks for having a look. But please comment on individual patches at appropriate places instead of sending this patch where everything is just mixed together. It is much easier to find out what we are