On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 10:39 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Lo! Your friendly Linux regression tracker here ;-)
>
> On 08.03.2018 14:18, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 18:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > This patchset tries to spread among online CPU
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 08:31 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I'm assuming that Martin will eventually queue this up. But probably
> for 4.17, then we can always flag it for a backport to stable once
> it's been thoroughly tested.
Jens, thanks for reply.
I wonder if folks agree that in this case we shou
queue which doesn't have any online CPU mapped.
>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" ,
> Cc: James Bottomley ,
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig ,
> Cc: Don Brace
> Cc: Kashyap Desai
> Cc: Laurence Oberman
> Cc: Mike Snitzer
> Cc: Meelis Roos
&g
On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 12:11 +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> > At 03/13/2018 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Artem Bityutskiy
> > > > Longer term, yeah, I agree. Kernel's notion of possible CPU
> > > > count
> &g
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 16:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Then looks this issue need to fix by making possible CPU count
> accurate
> because there are other resources allocated according to
> num_possible_cpus(),
> such as percpu variables.
Short term the regression should be fixed. It is already v4.1
On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 11:11 +0800, Dou Liyang wrote:
> I also
> met the situation that BIOS told to ACPI that it could support
> physical
> CPUs hotplug, But actually, there was no hardware slots in the
> machine.
> the ACPI tables like user inputs which should be validated when we
> use.
This is
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 09:24 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:20:09AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > Actually, it isn't a real fix, the real one is in the following
> > > two:
> > >
> > > 0c20244d458e scsi: megaraid_s
On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:18 +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519311270.2535.53.ca...@intel.com
And for completeness:
Linux-Regression-ID: lr#15a115
u list 1,6
> irq 41, cpu list 2,5
> irq 42, cpu list 3,7
>
> Without this patchset, only two vectors(39, 40) can be active, but there
> can be 4 active irq vectors after applying this patchset.
Tested-by: Artem Bityutskiy
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519311270.2535.53
