On 2017-11-16 20:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年11月17日 00:47, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
This is at least less complicated than dm-integrity.
Just a new hook for READ bio. And it can start from easy part.
Like starting from dm-raid1 and other fs support.
It's less complicated for end
On 2017-11-16 09:06, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年11月16日 20:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
bio_int
On 2017-11-16 07:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
bio_integrity_payload.
Hi
We already have dm
On 2016-10-06 11:05, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 06 ott 2016, alle ore 15:52, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
ha scritto:
On 2016-10-06 08:50, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 06 ott 2016, alle ore 13:57, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
ha scritto:
On 2016-10-06 07:03, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06
On 2016-10-06 08:50, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 06 ott 2016, alle ore 13:57, Austin S. Hemmelgarn
ha scritto:
On 2016-10-06 07:03, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
I get that bfq can
On 2016-10-06 07:03, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
I get that bfq can be a good compromise on most desktop workloads and
behave reasonably well for some server workloads with the slice
expirat
