Lo! Your friendly Linux regression tracker here ;-)
On 08.03.2018 14:18, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 18:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> This patchset tries to spread among online CPUs as far as possible, so
>> that we can avoid to allocate too less irq vectors with online CPUs
>>
TWIMC: This issue is tracked in the regression reports for Linux 4.13
(http://bit.ly/lnxregrep413 ) with this id:
Linux-Regression-ID: lr#35498d
Please include this line in the comment section of patches that are
supposed to fix the issue. Please also mention the string once in other
mailinglist
[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 22.12.23 19:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Coly,
>
> Yesterday
On 23.12.23 09:35, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
wrote:
> On 22.12.23 19:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
>> Coly,
>>
>> Yesterday I noticed that a few of our nvdimm tests were failing. I bisected
>> the problem to the following commit.
>>
>>
