> On 25 Oct 2017, at 20.24, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2017 01:53 AM, Javier González wrote:
>> One thing though: The patch does not apply on top of Jen's for-15/block.
>> It is trivial, but here you have a version that applies.
>
> Jens's...
>
> It won't work against that tree, as it doe
On 10/25/2017 01:53 AM, Javier González wrote:
> One thing though: The patch does not apply on top of Jen's for-15/block.
> It is trivial, but here you have a version that applies.
Jens's...
It won't work against that tree, as it doesn't have the necessary prep
patch. We can do this after the mer
> On 24 Oct 2017, at 17.30, Kees Cook wrote:
>
> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>
> Cc: Matias Bjorling
> Cc: linux-block@vger.kerne
In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
Cc: Matias Bjorling
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
---
drivers/lightnvm/pblk-co
