> On 2 Oct 2017, at 13.43, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 01:27:42PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
>>> On 28 Sep 2017, at 16.40, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>>>
>>> pblk_line_gc_list seems to had a bug since the introduction of pblk in
>>> getting GC list for a line. In b20ba1bc7 wh
On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 01:27:42PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
> > On 28 Sep 2017, at 16.40, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
> >
> > pblk_line_gc_list seems to had a bug since the introduction of pblk in
> > getting GC list for a line. In b20ba1bc7 while redesigning GC
> > algorithm it was not fixed corr
> On 28 Sep 2017, at 16.40, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
>
> pblk_line_gc_list seems to had a bug since the introduction of pblk in
> getting GC list for a line. In b20ba1bc7 while redesigning GC
> algorithm it was not fixed correctly. The problem is that even if
> valid sector count (vsc) is less that
pblk_line_gc_list seems to had a bug since the introduction of pblk in
getting GC list for a line. In b20ba1bc7 while redesigning GC
algorithm it was not fixed correctly. The problem is that even if
valid sector count (vsc) is less that mid_thrs (threshold for GC mid
list) it would always satisfy