On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:11:58PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Which flags are you talking about? aio ones? AFAICS, it's the same
> kind of thing as "can we lseek?" or "can we read/pread?", etc.
> What would that field look like? Note that some of those might depend
> upon the flags passed to
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:14:31PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 05:38:13PM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> > We had FS_NOWAIT in filesystem type flags (in v3), but retracted it
> > later in v4.
>
> A per-fs flag is wrong as file_operation may have different
>
On 06/10/2017 12:34 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> As already indicated this whole series looks fine to me.
>>
>> Al: are you going to pick this up? Or Andrew?
>
> The main issue here is "let's bail out from ->write_iter() instances"
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:39:10AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> As already indicated this whole series looks fine to me.
>
> Al: are you going to pick this up? Or Andrew?
The main issue here is "let's bail out from ->write_iter() instances"
patch. It very obviously has holes in coverage.
As already indicated this whole series looks fine to me.
Al: are you going to pick this up? Or Andrew?
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 06:19:29AM -0500, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote:
> This series adds nonblocking feature to asynchronous I/O writes.
> io_submit() can be delayed because of a number of
