On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 00:38 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:22:33PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 13:00 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > No, do not mix two different things in one patch, especially the fix part
> > > need to be backported to stable.
> > >
On Wed, 2017-12-06 at 00:38 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:22:33PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 13:00 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > >
> > > No, do not mix two different things in one patch, especially the
> > > fix part need to be backported to
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 04:22:33PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 13:00 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > No, do not mix two different things in one patch, especially the fix part
> > need to be backported to stable.
> >
> > The fix part should aim at V4.15, and the other part can
On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 13:00 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> No, do not mix two different things in one patch, especially the fix part
> need to be backported to stable.
>
> The fix part should aim at V4.15, and the other part can be a V4.16
> stuff.
Does this mean that you do not plan to post a v5 of
Hi Ming,
> Please cook a patch for fixing the crash issue only, since we need
> to backport the fix to stable kernel.
I thought you were going to submit a V5 that addressed James' concerns?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 01:59:51AM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 09:15 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:38:08PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > > Since the next patch will make it possible that scsi_show_rq() gets
> > > called before the CDB pointer
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:42:28PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Hi Ming,
>
> > Please cook a patch for fixing the crash issue only, since we need
> > to backport the fix to stable kernel.
>
> I thought you were going to submit a V5 that addressed James' concerns?
>
> --
> Martin K.
On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 09:15 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:38:08PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Since the next patch will make it possible that scsi_show_rq() gets
> > called before the CDB pointer is changed into a non-NULL value,
> > only show the CDB if the CDB pointer
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 04:38:08PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Since the next patch will make it possible that scsi_show_rq() gets
> called before the CDB pointer is changed into a non-NULL value,
> only show the CDB if the CDB pointer is not NULL. Additionally,
> show the request timeout and
Since the next patch will make it possible that scsi_show_rq() gets
called before the CDB pointer is changed into a non-NULL value,
only show the CDB if the CDB pointer is not NULL. Additionally,
show the request timeout and SCSI command flags. This patch also
fixes a bug that was reported by Ming
10 matches
Mail list logo