On 10/29/18 9:51 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29 2018 at 10:25am -0400,
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/18 1:10 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 10/25/18 11:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
On Mon, Oct 29 2018 at 10:25am -0400,
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/29/18 1:10 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 10/25/18 11:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
> >> ---
> >> block/blk-core.c | 28 -
On 10/29/18 1:10 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 10/25/18 11:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
>> ---
>> block/blk-core.c | 28
>> block/blk-settings.c | 6 --
>> drivers
On 10/25/18 11:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
block/blk-core.c | 28
block/blk-settings.c | 6 --
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 4 +---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 4
4
On 10/25/18 3:42 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 15:10 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
>
> How about changing the description of this patch into something
> like "Now that the blk_lld_busy() and blk_queue_lld_busy() callers
> h
On Thu, 2018-10-25 at 15:10 -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
How about changing the description of this patch into something
like "Now that the blk_lld_busy() and blk_queue_lld_busy() callers
have been removed, also remove the implementations of th
Nobody sets the helper, so we always return 0. Kill it.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
block/blk-core.c | 28
block/blk-settings.c | 6 --
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 4 +---
include/linux/blkdev.h | 4
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 41 deletions(-)