Ops, my fault of course. I submitted the patch I made on top of the dev version
of bfq. Preparing a V2. Sorry.
> Il giorno 15 lug 2019, alle ore 12:49, Holger Hoffstätte
> ha scritto:
>
> On 7/15/19 12:18 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> Didn't I simply move it forward in that commit?
>>> Il giorno
On 7/15/19 12:18 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Didn't I simply move it forward in that commit?
Il giorno 15 lug 2019, alle ore 12:16, Holger Hoffstätte
ha scritto:
Paolo,
The function idling_needed_for_service_guarantees() was just removed in
5.3-commit
3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule emp
Paolo,
The function idling_needed_for_service_guarantees() was just removed in
5.3-commit
3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve I/O
plugging").
See [1].
cheers
Holger
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/block/bfq-iosch
Didn't I simply move it forward in that commit?
> Il giorno 15 lug 2019, alle ore 12:16, Holger Hoffstätte
> ha scritto:
>
>
> Paolo,
>
> The function idling_needed_for_service_guarantees() was just removed in
> 5.3-commit
> 3726112ec731 ("block, bfq: re-schedule empty queues if they deserve
Consider a sync bfq_queue Q that remains empty while in service, and
suppose that, when this happens, there is a fair amount of already
in-flight I/O not belonging to Q. This situation is not considered
when deciding whether to plug I/O dispatching (until new I/O arrives
for Q). But it has to be ch
