> Il giorno 1 nov 2018, alle ore 22:06, Holger Hoffstätte
> ha scritto:
>
> On 11/01/18 18:43, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
>> With default 8ms idle slice BFQ is up to 10 times slower than CFQ
>> for massive random read workloads for common SATA SSD.
>> For now zero idle slice gives better ou
On 11/01/18 18:43, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
With default 8ms idle slice BFQ is up to 10 times slower than CFQ
for massive random read workloads for common SATA SSD.
For now zero idle slice gives better out of box experience.
CFQ employs this since commit 41c0126b3f22 ("block: Make CFQ defaul
With default 8ms idle slice BFQ is up to 10 times slower than CFQ
for massive random read workloads for common SATA SSD.
For now zero idle slice gives better out of box experience.
CFQ employs this since commit 41c0126b3f22 ("block: Make CFQ default
to IOPS mode on SSDs")
Signed-off-by: Konstanti
