On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:23:35PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:22:16PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > cg1/cg2 bps: 10/80 -> 15/105 -> 20/100 -> 25/95 -> 30/90 -> 35/85 -> 40/80
> > -> 45/75 -> 10/80
>
> I wonder whether it'd make sense to make the clamping down g
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:22:16PM -0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> cg1/cg2 bps: 10/80 -> 15/105 -> 20/100 -> 25/95 -> 30/90 -> 35/85 -> 40/80
> -> 45/75 -> 10/80
I wonder whether it'd make sense to make the clamping down gradual too
(way faster than the ramping up but still gradual). The contr
When cgroups all reach high limit, cgroups can dispatch more IO. This
could make some cgroups dispatch more IO but others not, and even some
cgroups could dispatch less IO than their high limit. For example, cg1
high limit 10MB/s, cg2 limit 80MB/s, assume disk maximum bandwidth is
120M/s for the wo
