On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 03:19:37PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > You could also say that flush sequence counting code doesn't belong
> > to xfs code at all. There is nothing xfs specific about it.
> >
> > If we had an API:
> >
> > flush_seq = blkdev_get_flush_seq(bdev, flush_seq);
> > blkde
> You could also say that flush sequence counting code doesn't belong
> to xfs code at all. There is nothing xfs specific about it.
>
> If we had an API:
>
> flush_seq = blkdev_get_flush_seq(bdev, flush_seq);
> blkdev_issue_flush_after(bdev, flush_seq);
>
> I am sure it would have been useful to
[-stable]
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 06:47:03PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 4:19 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
>> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:39:25PM +0300, Amir Goldstein wrote:
>> >> When calling into _xfs_log_force{,_lsn
