On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:58 AM, Kent Overstreet
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:31:33PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> This patch is definitely correct, and I don't see dealing with 'no_merge'
>> should be removed.
>>
>> In this case, the bio is still possible to merge with others because
>> it do
On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 05:31:33PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> This patch is definitely correct, and I don't see dealing with 'no_merge'
> should be removed.
>
> In this case, the bio is still possible to merge with others because
> it doesn't violate any limit of the queue because it just can't be h
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Eric Wheeler wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:11:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> > > After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
>> > > be very big. We have to split the bio
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:11:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
> > > be very big. We have to split the bio into small bios so that
> > > each holds at most BIO_MAX_P
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:11:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
> > be very big. We have to split the bio into small bios so that
> > each holds at most BIO_MAX_PAGES bvecs
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:11:22PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
> be very big. We have to split the bio into small bios so that
> each holds at most BIO_MAX_PAGES bvecs for safety reason, such
> as bio_clone().
I still think working around a
After arbitrary bio size is supported, the incoming bio may
be very big. We have to split the bio into small bios so that
each holds at most BIO_MAX_PAGES bvecs for safety reason, such
as bio_clone().
This patch fixes the following kernel crash:
> [ 172.660142] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL