On 01/16/2017 08:16 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/16/2017 08:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 01/16/2017 01:11 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 05:02 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 01/13/2017 09:00 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 08:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On
On 01/16/2017 08:12 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/16/2017 01:11 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 05:02 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 09:00 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 01/13/2017 08:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 04:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On
On 01/15/2017 03:12 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 11 gen 2017, alle ore 22:39, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>>
>> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
>> was here:
>>
>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>>
>> (yes, I've
> Il giorno 11 gen 2017, alle ore 22:39, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>
> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
> was here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>
> (yes, I've skipped v5, it was fixes on top of v4, not the rework).
>
On 01/13/2017 09:02 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Also, would be great if you could pull:
>
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block blk-mq-sched
>
> into current 'master' and see if it still reproduces. I expect that it
> will, but just want to ensure that it's a problem in the current code
> base as well.
On 01/13/2017 09:00 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 08:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 04:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 08:33 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> [ .. ]
Ah, indeed.
There is an ominous udev rule here, trying to switch to 'deadline'.
#
On 01/13/2017 08:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 04:34 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 08:33 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> [ .. ]
>>> Ah, indeed.
>>> There is an ominous udev rule here, trying to switch to 'deadline'.
>>>
>>> # cat 60-ssd-scheduler.rules
>>> # do not edit this
On 01/13/2017 08:33 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 04:23 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 01/13/2017 04:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>>> On 01/13/2017 09:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The
On 01/13/2017 04:04 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 09:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
>>> was here:
>>>
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>>>
>>>
On Fri, Jan 13 2017, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 12:04 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > On 01/13/2017 09:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >> On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
> >>> was here:
> >>>
> >>>
On 01/13/2017 12:04 PM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 09:15 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
>>> was here:
>>>
>>> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>>>
>>>
On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
> was here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>
> (yes, I've skipped v5, it was fixes on top of v4, not the rework).
>
> I've reworked bits of this to get rid
On 01/11/2017 10:39 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Another year, another posting of this patchset. The previous posting
> was here:
>
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406106.html
>
> (yes, I've skipped v5, it was fixes on top of v4, not the rework).
>
> I've reworked bits of this to get rid
On Wed, 2017-01-11 at 14:39 -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I've reworked bits of this to get rid of the shadow requests, thanks
> to Bart for the inspiration. The missing piece, for me, was the fact
> that we have the tags->rqs[] indirection array already. I've done this
> somewhat differently,
14 matches
Mail list logo