> On 6 Oct 2017, at 01.36, Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:53:50PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> lockdep is reporting a circular dependency when using XFS and pblk,
>> which I am a bit confused about.
>>
>> This happens when XFS sends a number of nested reads and
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 12:53:50PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lockdep is reporting a circular dependency when using XFS and pblk,
> which I am a bit confused about.
>
> This happens when XFS sends a number of nested reads and (at least) one
> of them hits partially pblk's cache. In t
> On 5 Oct 2017, at 18.24, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> On 10/05/2017 04:53 AM, Javier González wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> lockdep is reporting a circular dependency when using XFS and pblk,
>> which I am a bit confused about.
>>
>> This happens when XFS sends a number of nested reads and (at least) one
>> o
On 10/05/2017 04:53 AM, Javier González wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lockdep is reporting a circular dependency when using XFS and pblk,
> which I am a bit confused about.
>
> This happens when XFS sends a number of nested reads and (at least) one
> of them hits partially pblk's cache. In this case, pblk wil