On 12/20/17 1:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:40:25PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 12/20/17 12:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> For some reason, commit 966a967116e6 was added to the tree without
>>> CC'ing relevant maintainers, even though it's touching random subsystems.
>>
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:40:25PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/20/17 12:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > For some reason, commit 966a967116e6 was added to the tree without
> > CC'ing relevant maintainers, even though it's touching random subsystems.
> > One example is struct request, a core struct
On 12/20/17 12:10 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> For some reason, commit 966a967116e6 was added to the tree without
> CC'ing relevant maintainers, even though it's touching random subsystems.
> One example is struct request, a core structure in the block layer.
> After this change, struct request grows fr
For some reason, commit 966a967116e6 was added to the tree without
CC'ing relevant maintainers, even though it's touching random subsystems.
One example is struct request, a core structure in the block layer.
After this change, struct request grows from 296 to 320 bytes on my
setup.
Why are we bli