On Thursday 2008-05-01 22:10, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
Couldn't you #ifdef based on CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR ? This ought to
work for Hardy. However the next development kernel (Intrepid) does not
have the APPARMOR patches, so just knowing that its an UBUNTU kernel is
not specific
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Gardner wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>
>> [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
>>
> This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
> patch:
>
> If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUN
Hi,
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 01:36:25PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >
> > [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
> >
> This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
> patch:
>
> If there is a #ifdef
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
>
> [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
>
This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
patch:
If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll do it. Jeff
Mahoney has a similar patch fo
Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> adding the ubuntu kernel team. BenC or TimG, do you have any
> suggestions for Chris?
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Mason wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
>
> [ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
>
This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
patch:
If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll d
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
[ btrfs oops on ubuntu ]
> >> This is because ubuntu kernels ship with apparmor, you'll need this
> >> patch:
> >>
> >> If there is a #ifdef IM_A_UBUNTU_KERNEL I can use, I'll do it. Jeff
> >> Mahoney has a similar patch for SUSE that I've been meani
adding the ubuntu kernel team. BenC or TimG, do you have any
suggestions for Chris?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> > On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > Btrfs v0.14 is now available for download. Please note the disk
> > > format has changed, a
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:04 AM, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Btrfs v0.14 is now available for download. Please note the disk format has
> > changed, and it is not compatible with older versions of Btrfs.
> >
On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Chris Mason wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Btrfs v0.14 is now available for download. Please note the disk format has
> changed, and it is not compatible with older versions of Btrfs.
>
> For downloads and documention, please see the Btrfs project page:
>
> http://btrfs.wik
11 matches
Mail list logo