On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:55:44PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> So there is an odd case where we can possibly return -ENOSPC when there is in
> fact space to be had. I think I finally have a hold on what the problem is,
> it
> only happens with Metadata writes, and happens _very_ infre
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 14:12 +0200, Xavier Nicollet wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to compile btrfs.ko (unstable) for 2.6.27-rc9.
> I copied btrfs part of Kbuild, and fs/btrfs to my 2.6.27-rc9 tree.
>
> Then make modules modules_install
> However, I can't insmod btrfs.ko. Dmesg ouput:
>
* Xavier Nicollet ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to compile btrfs.ko (unstable) for 2.6.27-rc9.
> I copied btrfs part of Kbuild, and fs/btrfs to my 2.6.27-rc9 tree.
>
> Then make modules modules_install
> However, I can't insmod btrfs.ko. Dmesg ouput:
>
> [ 8973.920
Hello,
So there is an odd case where we can possibly return -ENOSPC when there is in
fact space to be had. I think I finally have a hold on what the problem is, it
only happens with Metadata writes, and happens _very_ infrequently. What has to
happen is we have to allocate have allocated out of
Hello everyone,
I am trying to compile btrfs.ko (unstable) for 2.6.27-rc9.
I copied btrfs part of Kbuild, and fs/btrfs to my 2.6.27-rc9 tree.
Then make modules modules_install
However, I can't insmod btrfs.ko. Dmesg ouput:
[ 8973.920435] btrfs: no symbol version for struct_module
[ 8994.375255]
2008/10/10 Andrea Gelmini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/10/9 Yan Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Andrea, did you create swap file on btrfs?
> No, but Azureus (see my other email) plays a lot with holes.
Well, I try to extend my previous reply (in the meanwhile it crashed
again (kernel) with a newly ad
2008/10/9 Yan Zheng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Andrea, did you create swap file on btrfs?
No, but Azureus (see my other email) plays a lot with holes.
Thanks a lot,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More major
2008/10/9 Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yan,
>
> Can these leaf ref miss warnings trigger corruptions? I thought not but
> its clear there is some metadata corruption here:
>
> Andrea, how exactly did you trigger this?
Nothing in particular, usual work session on my laptop.
It seems to be it