On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > Just got this error today in my dmesg:
> > > > btrfs csum faile
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:11PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf spake thusly:
> I've already deleted the file in question unfortunately.
> On IRC Chris decided that either bad RAM or a harddrive error was the
> most likely reason for this chechsum mismatch.
Which raises an interesting point: I know
Thanks! I have a follow up question: Are back references reference
counted? If so, this should mean that after the file system COWs an
inode, it must increase the reference counts of its file extent back
references. Do we know what is the overhead? In the case they are not
reference counted, ho
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:32:14PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > > Just got this error today in my dmesg:
> > > > btrfs csum faile
On Tue, Sep 08 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > Just got this error today in my dmesg:
> > > btrfs csum failed ino 1483065 off 158482432 csum 4283543305 private
> > > 43905798
>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:00:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > Just got this error today in my dmesg:
> > btrfs csum failed ino 1483065 off 158482432 csum 4283543305 private 43905798
> >
> > linux % find . -inum 1483065
> > ./.git/objects/pack/pac
On Mon, Sep 07 2009, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> Just got this error today in my dmesg:
> btrfs csum failed ino 1483065 off 158482432 csum 4283543305 private 43905798
>
> linux % find . -inum 1483065
> ./.git/objects/pack/pack-f9251bcc6a8afe3c92193e14d1d742f2f0182ce5.pack
>
> It's the main pack
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:15:29AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:32 -0400, jim owens wrote:
> > @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ again:
> > multi->num_stripes = num_stripes;
> > multi->max_errors = max_errors;
> > }
> > - if (raid_map_re
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 12:32 -0400, jim owens wrote:
> @@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ again:
> multi->num_stripes = num_stripes;
> multi->max_errors = max_errors;
> }
> - if (raid_map_ret) {
> + if (raid_map) {
> sort_parity_stripes(multi, r
