On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 02:33:13PM +0100, Andi Drebes wrote:
In the new patch below, is_pseudo_fs() is replaced by
is_existing_blk_or_reg_file(). We ignore entries associated with an
invalid path or paths that don't point to a regular or block file.
However, if a path used in a
I installed BtrFS 0.19 and GNU coreutils 8.1 on my Ubuntu 9.10.
I tried to clone some files with --reflink to make them copy-on-write.
However, I found some of the files cloned have different MD5's to the
original ones.
Is BtrFS (or cp with reflink) buggy?
Or it is indeed a feature that I used
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 05:26:32PM +0800, Jian Lin wrote:
I installed BtrFS 0.19 and GNU coreutils 8.1 on my Ubuntu 9.10.
I tried to clone some files with --reflink to make them copy-on-write.
However, I found some of the files cloned have different MD5's to the
original ones.
Is BtrFS (or
Thanks. I will try the new version soon.
2009/11/23 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com:
Jian Lin wrote:
2009/11/23 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com:
Jian Lin wrote:
I installed BtrFS 0.19 and GNU coreutils 8.1 on my Ubuntu 9.10.
I tried to clone some files with cp --reflink to make them
Jian Lin wrote:
2009/11/23 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com:
Jian Lin wrote:
I installed BtrFS 0.19 and GNU coreutils 8.1 on my Ubuntu 9.10.
I tried to clone some files with cp --reflink to make them
copy-on-write.
However, I found some of the files cloned have different MD5s to the
Hi,
back at http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0901.2/00647.html
there was a readdir problem with the last entry. This issue has
resurfaced in 2.6.31.6 (yeah, yeah), with only slight differences.
Instead of entries being returned with key 4294967295, they are not
returned at all
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 06:46:58PM +0530, pragnesh radadia wrote:
I got following kernel oops when trying to compile kernel on btrfs
partation on my laptop.
This is probably running out of space. Could you please send along the
lines around line number 735 in fs/btrfs/inode.c?
-chris
--
To
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:05:11PM -0600, David Nicol wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
COW semantics require touching btree nodes all the way up to the root of
the btree, but this is different from the directory. Directories are
stored in
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:31:06AM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Friday 20 November 2009, Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 07:50:06PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi all,
after the Chirs (Ball) email, I thought about a possible btrfs
file-system
