Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Zhu Yanhai wrote:
Hi Chris,
The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11.
As it
already has some major features since then, do you think it's time
to
give it a 0.20 version number and release? It
Hi,
ln segfaults, and the bug above is found in dmesg. Subsequent
accesses to the subvolume result in a D state hung process. Full
dmesg follows. I first observed this on a Gentoo system and
reproduced it on Ubuntu. Both were running unpatched 2.6.32.9
kernels.
I think
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:39:38PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
I think this is fixed in 2.6.33, as a result of the patch below.
Let us know if you see a segfault on 2.6.33, or after applying this
patch to your current kernel.
This patch does fix the problem for 2.6.32.9, thanks. Has this patch
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Bruce Guenter br...@untroubled.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:39:38PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
I think this is fixed in 2.6.33, as a result of the patch below.
Let us know if you see a segfault on 2.6.33, or after applying this
patch to your current
Hi everyone,
This merge window conflicted with my spring break skiing window, so this
pull request is very very short. I have a larger one in testing but
really wanted to get this out.
Linus, please pull the btrfs-unstable master branch:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Mike Fedyk mfe...@mikefedyk.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Bruce Guenter br...@untroubled.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:39:38PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote:
I think this is fixed in 2.6.33, as a result of the patch below.
Let us know if you see
Hi all,
I'm wondering why 'btrfs-debug-tree -e' currently prints out nothing
with btrfs-progs v0.19-4-gab8fb4c, and kernel v2.6.33. I'd like to
experiment with the 'show-blocks' script, but it needs some output
from 'btrfs-debug-tree -e', which I apparently can't provide.
- Steven
--
To
