Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:12:57PM +0200, Edward Shishkin wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:15:28AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
I'll reproduce from your test case and provide a fix. mount -o
max_inline=1500 would give us 50% usage in the
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:54:01PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
If you export two subvolumes of a btrfs filesystem, they will both be
given the same uuid so lookups will be confused.
blkid cannot differentiate the two, so we must use the fsid from
statfs64 to identify the filesystem.
We
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:28:38 -0400
J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:54:01PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
If you export two subvolumes of a btrfs filesystem, they will both be
given the same uuid so lookups will be confused.
blkid cannot differentiate
Edward Shishkin wrote:
I have noticed that events in Btrfs develop by scenario not predicted
by the paper of academic Ohad Rodeh (in spite of the announce that
Btrfs is based on this paper). This is why I have started to grumble..
In btrfs, based on means started with the algorithm and ideas
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 07:31:57AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:28:38 -0400
J. Bruce Fields bfie...@fieldses.org wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 02:54:01PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
If you export two subvolumes of a btrfs filesystem, they will both be
given the
Edward Shishkin wrote:
I'll try to help, but I am rather pessimistic here: working out
algorithms is something, which doesn't like timelines..
Nonsense. Working out algorithms is just work to an algorithm
designer, just like programming is work to a programmer. Sure, some
things are harder
Just an FYI reminder. The original test (2K files) is utterly
pathological for disk drives with 4K physical sectors, such as
those now shipping from WD, Seagate, and others. Some of the
SSDs have larger (16K0 or smaller blocks (2K). There is also
the issue of btrfs over RAID (which I know is
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Daniel Taylor daniel.tay...@wdc.com wrote:
Just an FYI reminder. The original test (2K files) is utterly
pathological for disk drives with 4K physical sectors, such as
those now shipping from WD, Seagate, and others. Some of the
SSDs have larger (16K0 or
