this I can release, the user-facing API.
diff --git a/man/btrfsctl.8.in b/man/btrfsctl.8.in
index c2d4488..94403a4 100644
--- a/man/btrfsctl.8.in
+++ b/man/btrfsctl.8.in
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@ Scans all devices present in the system for btrfs filesystem.
.TP
\fB\-c\fR
Forces a filesystem sync.
+.T
I have written and am currently testing a patch that provides a new
ioctl that waits for snapshot deletion to finish before returning; The
work is being sponsored, and I can't distribute it until the
sponsorship details are more solid, but I'd like to reserve ioctl #21
for this purpose (the next on
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 6:56 AM, Jaswinder Singh Rajput
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:32:20PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>>>
>>> if (ret) is useless as it will be never NULL as in previous statement
>>> we are s
Hello,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:32:20PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>>
>> if (ret) is useless as it will be never NULL as in previous statement
>> we are setting ret = prev for !ret
>
> If there is no match and no extent below t
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race (+1/-1)
This seems to cause a hang when there are "parent transid verify failed" errors.
Somebody on #btrfs told me to revert it, and at least the system
doesn't hang any more.
--
Felipe Cont
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:32:20PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>
> if (ret) is useless as it will be never NULL as in previous statement
> we are setting ret = prev for !ret
If there is no match and no extent below the given file offset, `prev'
will be NULL as well, no?
So the check is
if (ret) is useless as it will be never NULL as in previous statement
we are setting ret = prev for !ret
Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Cc: Chris Mason
---
fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c b/fs/btr
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Frank Morales II wrote:
> >From 1c304defc543738f82ccb18fe10b558dd2098d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frank Morales II
> Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:34:23 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c: fixed compiler warnings for using
> uninitialized variab
