Should check if functions returns NULL or not.
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.c |6 ++
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |8
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c |2 ++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.c b/fs/btrfs/ctree.c
index 9ac17
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:40 +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2011 06:40:32 Shaohua Li wrote:
>
> > +static int ioctl_metadata_incore(struct file *filp, void __user *argp)
> > +{
> > + struct super_block *sb = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb;
> > + struct metadata_
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 17:51 +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 January 2011 06:40:37 Shaohua Li wrote:
> > /*
> > * When you add any new common ioctls to the switches above and below
> > * please update compat_sys_ioctl() too.
> > @@ -664,6 +682,9 @@ int do_vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 00:14 +0800, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Shaohua Li writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > We have file readahead to do asyn file read, but has no metadata
> > readahead. For a list of files, their metadata is stored in fragmented
> > disk space and metadata read is a sync operation, which impacts
You're little trick with touching a blank /proc/mounts works, FWIW.
You're "--force" patch works even better however ;)
Thanks!
.:Justin:.
--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
> From: Goffredo Baroncelli
> Subject: Re: Odd mkbtrfs behavior inside of chroot
> To: "J G"
> Cc: linux-
Binding /sys proved futile.
.:Justin:.
--- On Sun, 1/2/11, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> From: Jérôme Poulin
> Subject: Re: Odd mkbtrfs behavior inside of chroot
> To: "J G"
> Cc: "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org"
> Date: Sunday, January 2, 2011, 1:06 PM
> Did you try using -o bind on /proc
> and /sys
Shaohua Li writes:
> Hi,
> We have file readahead to do asyn file read, but has no metadata
> readahead. For a list of files, their metadata is stored in fragmented
> disk space and metadata read is a sync operation, which impacts the
> efficiency of readahead much. The patches try to add meata
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 06:40:37 Shaohua Li wrote:
> /*
> * When you add any new common ioctls to the switches above and below
> * please update compat_sys_ioctl() too.
> @@ -664,6 +682,9 @@ int do_vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsi
> case FIMETADATA_INCORE:
> return
On Tuesday 04 January 2011 06:40:32 Shaohua Li wrote:
> +static int ioctl_metadata_incore(struct file *filp, void __user *argp)
> +{
> + struct super_block *sb = filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_sb;
> + struct metadata_incore_args args;
> + struct metadata_incore_ent ent;
> +
