Re: 2.6.37: bash is looping unkillably in btrfs

2011-02-12 Thread Josef Bacik
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:53:31PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > >> I have two processes that are unkillable and taking about 50% of a CPU > >> each.  There is no actual

[PATCH] Btrfs: fix missing printk priority level

2011-02-12 Thread Yoshinori Sano
This is a trivial fix that sets priority level of printk. Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano --- fs/btrfs/super.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c index 0209b5f..f6ce38c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/super.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c @

Re: 2.6.37: bash is looping unkillably in btrfs

2011-02-12 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:53:31PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: >> I have two processes that are unkillable and taking about 50% of a CPU >> each.  There is no actual I/O happening (disk light is off and the >> disk even spun down after awhi

Re: 2.6.37: bash is looping unkillably in btrfs

2011-02-12 Thread Josef Bacik
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 02:53:31PM -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > I have two processes that are unkillable and taking about 50% of a CPU > each. There is no actual I/O happening (disk light is off and the > disk even spun down after awhile). This may or may not be related to > unmounting a fil

2.6.37: bash is looping unkillably in btrfs

2011-02-12 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
I have two processes that are unkillable and taking about 50% of a CPU each. There is no actual I/O happening (disk light is off and the disk even spun down after awhile). This may or may not be related to unmounting a filesystem. (I'm not sure -- I have two btrfs failesystems and I unmounted on

Re: no space left on device

2011-02-12 Thread Erik Logtenberg
>> That patch is released on this list on january 26th, called "Fix >> balance panic". If you experience the same, you could try applying >> this patch too. There is no (pre-built) kernel yet with this patch >> already applied. > > Maybe it will help. But my actual problem is: I cannot mount the

[PATCH] fix uncheck memory allocations

2011-02-12 Thread Yoshinori Sano
To make Btrfs code more robust, several return value checks where memory allocation can fail are introduced. I use BUG_ON where I don't know how to handle the error properly, which increases the number of using the notorious BUG_ON, though. Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano --- fs/btrfs/compression