(2011/06/07 14:59), Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> Hi liubo,
>
> (2011/06/07 14:31), liubo wrote:
>> On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus'
>>> kernel.
>>>
>>> I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /tes
Hi liubo,
(2011/06/07 14:31), liubo wrote:
> On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus'
>> kernel.
>>
>> I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5
>> is as follows:
>>
>> /dev/sdc3 on /test5 type
On 03/06/11 12:41, Adrian Hunter wrote:
No improvement on 3.0-rc1+ (commit
5c6cce92bc8aee751aafe82c5d9caf7553226a3d).
And on 59c5f46fbe01a00eedf54a23789634438bb80603 Linux 3.0-rc2
btrfs quickly fails to mount due to no space e.g.
Script
--
#!/bin/sh
sudo modprobe brd rd_size=262144
sud
On 06/06/2011 04:33 PM, Tsutomu Itoh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus'
> kernel.
>
> I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5
> is as follows:
>
> /dev/sdc3 on /test5 type btrfs (rw,space_cache,compress=lzo,inode_cache)
>
On fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:46:10 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I got a lot of these when running stress.sh on my test box
>
> [ 9792.654889] [ cut here ]
> [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681
> btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]()
> [ 9792.654899] Hardwa
Hello list,
I've been using btrfs on my personal machines for about two years now,
and on this machine for about a year with absolutely no problems.
Infact, it has held up better than ext4 with regards to reliability.
However, recently, perhaps with 2.6.39, or after I quickly started
filling up m
We have been using space_info->bytes_reserved in the metadata case to cover our
reservations for ENOSPC. The problem with this is thats horribly wrong. We use
bytes_reserved to keep track of how many bytes the allocator has outstanding
that haven't actually been made into extents yet. So what ha
Excerpts from Hugo Mills's message of 2011-06-01 19:20:58 -0400:
>Over the last few weeks, I've been playing with a foolish idea,
> mostly triggered by a cluster of people being confused by btrfs's free
> space reporting (df vs btrfs fi df vs btrfs fi show). I also wanted an
> excuse, and some
Chris Mason on 10 Feb 13:17:
> Excerpts from Ben Gamari's message of 2011-02-09 21:52:20 -0500:
> > Over the last several months there have been many claims regarding
> > the release of the rewritten btrfsck. Unfortunately, despite
> > numerous claims that it will be released Real Soon Now(c), I ha
Hello,
the issue happens every time when i have to hard power-off my notebook (suspend
problems).
With kernel 2.6.39 the partition is unmountable, solution is to boot 2.6.38
kernel which
1/ is able to mount the partition,
2/ by doing that fixes the problem so later .39 (after clean shutdown)
Hi,
I encountered following panic using 'btrfs-unstable + for-linus'
kernel.
I ran "btrfs fi bal /test5" command, and mount option of /test5
is as follows:
/dev/sdc3 on /test5 type btrfs (rw,space_cache,compress=lzo,inode_cache)
Thanks,
Tsutomu
11 matches
Mail list logo