hi,all
i use the UUID option to mount the btrfs disk,but i can not success.
first, the disk is /dev/sdd1
then, i pull out the disk
and after mintues, pushed it again,at this time, it changes to /dev/sde1
but the UUID didn't change.
why i can not mount it successfuly?
the starce file attached.
2011/10/11 Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com:
On 10/10/2011 12:41 AM, Christian Brunner wrote:
I just realized that this is still the same warning I reported some month
ago.
I thought that this had been fixed with
25d37af374263243214be9d912cbb46a8e469bc7
which is included in the kernel I'm
Christoph,
Email following this will have patches, kindly find them.
Thanks, Anand
On 10/10/2011 07:21 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:58:47PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Now SCRATCH_DEV is derived from SCRATCH_DEV_POOL.
Moved code to delete and scan block device
Create snapshots in various ways, modify the data around the block and
file boundaries and verify the data integrity.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
263 | 192
+
263.out |2 +
README|
To verify the btrfs de-fragmentation does not fail
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
264 | 60
264.out |2 ++
group |1 +
3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 264
This will verify the various raid features in btrfs and device
replacement functionality
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
265 | 187
+++
265.out |2 +
group |1 +
3 files changed, 190 insertions(+),
please please fix your mail client not to wrap long lines ...
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:26:57PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
Create snapshots in various ways, modify the data around the block and
file boundaries and verify the data integrity.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:38:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
please please fix your mail client not to wrap long lines ...
And while we're at it please fix yours to not full quote :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 07:42:45AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:38:38PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
please please fix your mail client not to wrap long lines ...
And while we're at it please fix yours to not full quote :)
It was on purpose, I have marked some of
I have upgraded to 3.1 rc8.
I created a new subvolume for /home, copied the files there from the old
subvolume and deleted the old subvolume. It looks like the space has been
reclaimed fine.
Though when doing btrfsck I am still getting the same error
failed to find block number 150121762816
--
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:34:12PM -0500, John wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
I think I fixed this, try my git tree
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work.git
Let me know if it helps. And what are you doing when
Hi Linus,
Li Zefan hit some problems with looping in the btrfs autodefrag mode.
These two commits are in the btrfs-3.0 branch:
git://github.com/chrismason/linux.git btrfs-3.0
Chris Mason (1) commits (+3/-1):
Btrfs: make sure not to defrag extents past i_size
Li Zefan (1) commits (+7/-0):
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
go from taking around 45 minutes to 10 seconds on my freshly formatted 3 TiB
file system. This doesn't seem to break my other enospc tests, but could
really
Our unlink reservations were a bit much, we were reserving 10 and I only count 8
possible items we're touching, so comment what we're reserving for and fix the
count value. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 10
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
go from taking around 45 minutes to 10 seconds on my freshly formatted 3 TiB
file system. This doesn't seem to break my other enospc tests, but could
really
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
2011/10/11 Sage Weil s...@newdream.net:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote:
Maybe this one is easier:
One of our OSDs isn't starting, because ther is no current
directory. What I have are three snap directories.
total 0
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
This confirmed my speculation. I've fixed this bug a month ago, but
the patch hasn't hitted mainline.
You can try it out:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=131495014823121w=2
With this bug fixed, I think autodefrag won't
Create snapshots in various ways, modify the data around the block and
file boundaries and verify the data integrity.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
263 | 192 +
263.out |2 +
README|7
This will verify the various raid features in btrfs and device
replacement functionality
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
265 | 187 +++
265.out |2 +
group |1 +
3 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 0
Anand Jain (3):
263: Functional test case for the btrfs snapshot
264: Functional test case for the btrfs de-fragmentation
265: Functional test case for the btrfs raid operations
263 | 192 +
263.out |2 +
264
20 matches
Mail list logo
