-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/12/2011 06:47 PM, Jeff Putney wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Martin Steigerwald
> wrote:
>> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jeff Putney:
I do not argue that having a nice fsck sooner than later is
fine, but I question
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:52:52PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Create snapshots in various ways, modify the data around the block and
> file boundaries and verify the data integrity.
> +
> +# Create Dir tree and files in it.
> +# arg1 basedir
> +# arg2 dir depth
> +# arg3 nfile_min
> +# arg4 n
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 08:35 +0100, Leonidas Spyropoulos wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Is there a small script to test if TRIM is working on my system?
>
> Also what about defrag? Is it recommended and how importatnt? Can I
> check if I need it?
If you're asking about TRIM, then you're probably using
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:09:37AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:18 AM, David Sterba wrote:
>
> > "Resetting the UUID on btrfs isn't a quick-and-easy thing - you
> > have to walk the entire tree and change every object. We've got
> > a bad-hack in meego that uses btrfs-debu
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jeff Putney:
>> > I do not argue that having a nice fsck sooner than later is fine, but
>> > I question the usefulness of repeating reminders. Chris Mason and
>> > other developers possibly working o
This has been effectively unreachable for years, btrfs_read_dev_super()
implements this check earlier in the mount sequence.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |6 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
in
Initialize fs_info->bdev_holder a bit earlier to be able to pass a
correct holder id to blkdev_get() when opening seed devices with O_EXCL.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov
---
fs/btrfs/super.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 02:44:09PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jeff Putney:
> > I do not argue that having a nice fsck sooner than later is fine, but
> > I question the usefulness of repeating reminders. Chris Mason and
> > other developers possibly working on the fsck should know by now,
> > that you want it. So its unlik
> Even if its a thousand +1 following, it seems to me that its perfectly
> Chris Masons decision...
Obviously.
> Chris seems to have some ideas on when to release the fsck.
Yes, and that idea of when has been drifting in the couple week range
for about a year.
> So what do you
> think you achie
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> I think I fixed this, try my git tree
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work.git
I wanted to Ack this as well - 3.1-rc4 was completely unusable when
firefox was running (30+ second pauses to read directories, btrfs
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 03:45:45PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 02:44:09PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Mitch Har
Hello,
Am Freitag, 6. August 2010 schrieb Chris Mason:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 02:30:39PM +0300, Sami Liedes wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:22:14AM +0200, Oystein Viggen wrote:
> > > IIRC, the limit on hard links is per directory. That is, if you
> > > put each hard link into its own dir
- 原始信件
寄件者： bbsposters
收件者： "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org"
副本：
寄件日期： 2011/10/13 (四) 12:51 AM
主旨： Could I create volumes on one device ?
Hi list,
I want to create volumes (not subvolumes) on one device.
Could it work?
If it works, how can I do by btrfs tools ?
If it can't, is there any
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:51 PM, bbsposters wrote:
> Hi list,
> I want to create volumes (not subvolumes) on one device.
> Could it work?
> If it works, how can I do by btrfs tools ?
> If it can't, is there any way to create subvolumes which have their
> independent space?
> For example, I want
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Mitch Harder
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> I noticed that "btrfs subvolume snapshot" is now broken. It keeps on
>> saying "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot".
>>
>> Further checking shows it's caused by
>>
>> commit
Hi list,
I want to create volumes (not subvolumes) on one device.
Could it work?
If it works, how can I do by btrfs tools ?
If it can't, is there any way to create subvolumes which have their independent
space?
For example, I want to create 100MB for /home and 50 MB for /root.
thanks,
--
To unsub
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>> Fixes or updated patches for any problems you may find are
>> welcomed, of course.
>
> I noticed that "btrfs subvolume snapshot" is now broken. It keeps on
> saying "Invalid argumen
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> Fixes or updated patches for any problems you may find are
> welcomed, of course.
I noticed that "btrfs subvolume snapshot" is now broken. It keeps on
saying "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot".
Further checking shows it's caused by
Excerpts from Chester's message of 2011-10-12 00:14:21 -0400:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> >
> >
> > This confirmed my speculation. I've fixed this bug a month ago, but
> > the patch hasn't hitted mainline.
> >
> > You can try it out:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs
Am Freitag, 7. Oktober 2011 schrieb Gour-Gadadhara Dasa:
> On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:39:36 -0700
>
> Mike wrote:
> > I also don't think you are giving people enough credit. e2fsck will
> > cause corruption pretty much everytime its run on a mounted file
> > system, but a nice big nasty warning messa
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:21:45PM +0200, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> 2011/10/7 Josef Bacik :
> > On 10/06/2011 04:56 PM, Francesco Riosa wrote:
> >> 2011/10/6 Andi Kleen :
> >>> Jeff Putney writes:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Release_early,_release_often
> >>>
> >>> Well the other pri
tanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20111012
>
> This is only compile-tested so far, so there may still be serious
> problems with it. Please take care. I'm not likely to be able to do
> much additional work on it before the weekend, so I thought it would
> be better
All -
After a long wait (sorry about that, things have been busy for me
lately), I've managed to pull together a new integration branch for
btrfs-progs. This can be pulled from:
http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/ integration-20111012
This is only compile-t
24 matches
Mail list logo
