[11138.535482] device fsid 808bddf9-a2c5-4121-814f-ebbf4ec7d50c devid 1
transid 11368 /dev/vda1
[11276.469967] [ cut here ]
[11276.469980] WARNING: at
/build/buildd/linux-3.0.0/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5693
use_block_rsv+0xc0/0x170 [btrfs]()
[11276.469982] Hardware
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 05:33:51AM -0600, cwillu wrote:
3.0 is two revisions old -- something on the order of 6
months. There's been a lot of development since then, too. You really
should be running 3.2 or 3.2-rc2 (i.e. the latest released or latest
development version of the kernel).
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
It's quite old, but what was this about;
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487
Thanks, the patch looks ok and works as expected.
Goffredo, do you want to resend it? (The lock around the mnt_root is not
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:49PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
+_runtest()
+{
+ $progs_dir/runtest.sh $defrag_args $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_DEV
please put the actual tests into test cases themselves instead of
calling out into shell scripts under src. If you have common code
shared between multiple
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
It's quite old, but what was this about;
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487
Thanks, the patch looks ok and works as expected.
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:14 AM, David Nicol davidni...@gmail.com wrote:
Look! It's Putney's First Rule!
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jeff Putney jeffrey.put...@gmail.com
wrote:
Anyone can make up an axiom and call it the first rule of something.
--
Digital artists often sneer
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:18:24AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
It's quite old, but what was this about;
I rolled a new kernel 3.2.4 and it picked everything up.
No crashes, my disk was still full, with 40+ gigs free
but now I can delete files and access them.
I'm running btrfs fi balance /mountpoint at the moment which I understand frees
up the remaining space.
Thanks again for your assistance!
The btrfs tool is changed in order to support command line parameters
to configure the IO priority of the scrub tasks. Also the default is
changed. The default IO priority for scrub is the idle class now.
Some basic performance measurements have been done with the goal to
measure which IO
Reduce ioprio class of scrub readahead threads to idle priority.
This setting is fixed. This priority has shown the best performance
during all measurements.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |3 +++
fs/btrfs/reada.c |5 +
2 files changed, 8
On Saturday, 04 February, 2012 15:47:17 Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 02:06:28PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Ilya,
On Friday, 03 February, 2012 22:49:09 Ilya Dryomov wrote:
Hello,
This is the userspace part of restriper, rebased onto the new progs
On Saturday, 04 February, 2012 15:45:25 Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 01:54:23PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Hi Ilya
On Friday, 03 February, 2012 22:23:59 you wrote:
This completely replaces the existing subcommand infrastructure, which
is not flexible enough to
On 02/06/2012 08:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 04:27:49PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
+_runtest()
+{
+$progs_dir/runtest.sh $defrag_args $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_DEV
please put the actual tests into test cases themselves instead of
calling out into shell scripts under
Does anyone have any idea how I should proceed with the below quoted
situation? Unfortunately, I am going to have to give up on btrfs if
it is really so fragile. I am using kernel 3.2.2 and btrfs-tools
from November.
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:41:28PM -0600, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
Hi,
The Wiki does not make it clear as to why adding a secondary device
defaults to RAID1 metadata and RAID0 data. I bought two SSDs with the
intention of doing a BTRFS RAID0 for my root.
What is the difference between forcing RAID0 on metadata and data as
opposed to the default behavior? Can
On 02/07/2012 11:39 AM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
Does anyone have any idea how I should proceed with the below quoted
situation? Unfortunately, I am going to have to give up on btrfs if
it is really so fragile. I am using kernel 3.2.2 and btrfs-tools
from November.
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at
16 matches
Mail list logo
