Re: Can't mount, power failure - recoverable?

2012-07-13 Thread Skylar Burtenshaw
Martin Steigerwald lichtvoll.de> writes: > > > Since I didn´t found any explicit mention on it: > > > Did you try btrfs-zero-log on the partition prior to mounting it? I had tried that previously, yes. Approximately the date of my first post. Unless something significant has changed in that too

Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: allow mount -o remount,compress=no

2012-07-13 Thread Mitch Harder
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:40 AM, David Sterba wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 08:48:37AM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote: >> How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch >> (or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged? > > Josef picked the patch into btrfs-next, I see not problem to inc

Re: Can't mount, power failure - recoverable?

2012-07-13 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Freitag, 13. Juli 2012 schrieb Hugo Mills: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 02:23:53PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > > Am Montag, 26. März 2012 schrieb Skylar Burtenshaw: > > > Fajar A. Nugraha fajar.net> writes: > > > > Didn't Chris' last response basically say "use kernel 3.2 or > > > > newer,

Re: Can't mount, power failure - recoverable?

2012-07-13 Thread Hugo Mills
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 02:23:53PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Montag, 26. März 2012 schrieb Skylar Burtenshaw: > > Fajar A. Nugraha fajar.net> writes: > > > Didn't Chris' last response basically say "use kernel 3.2 or newer, > > > mount the fs (possibly with -o ro), and copy the data el

Re: Can't mount, power failure - recoverable?

2012-07-13 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Montag, 26. März 2012 schrieb Skylar Burtenshaw: > Fajar A. Nugraha fajar.net> writes: > > Didn't Chris' last response basically say "use kernel 3.2 or newer, > > mount the fs (possibly with -o ro), and copy the data elsewhere"? > > Why yes, yes it did actually. I appreciate your spotlighting

Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: improve multi-thread buffer read

2012-07-13 Thread Chris Mason
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:52:15PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > On 07/12/2012 02:04 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > I like this patch, its a big improvement for just a little timing > > change. Instead of doing the kmalloc of this struct, can you please > > change it to put a pagevec on the stack. > > > >