This should obviously not be "if (&flag)" but "if (flag)".
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens
---
fs/btrfs/locking.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.c b/fs/btrfs/locking.c
index a44eff074..2a1762c 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/lock
Hi Alexander,
I did some very initial testing, and there is still an issue.
The logic of finish_outoforder_dir works as expected. But then problem
is that later, when we process xattr/extents or finish the inode, the
code still uses get_cur_path(), which brings an incorrect name.
Consider the foll
Alexander,
(pls let me know when this gets annoying:).
Parent:
/mnt/src/v2_snap0/
└── [257] file1
Send:
/mnt/src/v2_snap1
└── [259] dir1
└── [258] dir2
└── [257] file1
I encountered two problems:
1) process_recorded_refs_if_needed() if needed does not call
process
I'm currently working on another solution for the initial problem. I
will create a for-alex branch for you to test later.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Alex Lyakas
wrote:
> Alexander,
> (pls let me know when this gets annoying:).
>
> Parent:
> /mnt/src/v2_snap0/
> └── [257] file1
>
> Send
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 08:39:36PM -0400, Marios Titas wrote:
> When I create a btrfs volume of size strictly less than 256 MiB then if I do
> mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/test
> the kernel tries unsuccessfully to do the mount with many other file systems
> before successfully trying with btrfs. For vo
Hi,
while testing a branch that'll become the next pull or so, I've hit $subj crash.
(top commit: Chris Mason [cmason/next] Btrfs: uninit variable fixes in
send/receive)
# btrfs fi df /mnt/sdc
Data: total=34.01GB, used=26.53GB
System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=12.00KB
System: total=4.00MB, used=0.
Hi Linus,
Since this has a conflict, I've split it into two branches.
# against 3.5, my diffstat is based on this branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git for-linus
# against your git as of today
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.gi
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 03:26:20PM +0200, Cyril B. wrote:
> When creating a filesystem with devices of different sizes, the resulting
> filesystem total size depends on the device order specified to mkfs. When
> the smaller device is specified first, the second (larger) device is seen as
> the
I have pushed a for-alex branch to github with a new approach for the
whole problem. Can you test this?
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Alexander Block
wrote:
> I'm currently working on another solution for the initial problem. I
> will create a for-alex branch for you to test later.
>
> On Thu,
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> for-linus-merged has an extra commit on top as well that changes the
> btrfs send/receive code to Al's new dentry_open. It's a small commit,
> and my guess is that you'll cherry pick it and do your own merge.
Indeed. And I dd the semantic m
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 09:56:26AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> find is fast, du is much slower:
>
> merkaba:~> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches ; time ( find /usr | wc -l )
> 404166
> ( find /usr | wc -l; ) 0,03s user 0,07s system 1% cpu 9,212 total
> merkaba:~> echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop
11 matches
Mail list logo
