On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused
> /dev/vdb 307.25 MB-2.23 GB
> /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB2.69 GB
> /dev/vdd 307.25 MB 8 MB2.24 GB
> ===
On 27 Oct 2012 23:38 +0100, from h...@carfax.org.uk (Hugo Mills):
>>>Data: RAID 0 System: RAID 1 Unused
>>> /dev/vdb 307.25 MB-2.23 GB
>>> /dev/vdc 307.25 MB 8 MB2.69 GB
>>> /dev/vdd 307.25 MB 8 MB2.24 GB
>>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:30:44AM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 schrieb Michael Kjörling:
> > On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from mar...@lichtvoll.de (Martin
> Steigerwald):
> > > Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like:
> > >
> > >
Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012 schrieb Michael Kjörling:
> On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from mar...@lichtvoll.de (Martin
Steigerwald):
> > Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like:
> >
> > vdb vdc vdd
> >
> > Data, RAID 0 307,25MB307,25
On 27 Oct 2012 23:02 +0100, from h...@carfax.org.uk (Hugo Mills):
>> I came across the tidbit that ZFS has a contract guarantee that the
>> data read back will either be correct (the checksum computed over the
>> data read from the disk matches the checksum stored on disk), or you
>> get an I/O err
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:56:45PM +, Michael Kjörling wrote:
> I came across the tidbit that ZFS has a contract guarantee that the
> data read back will either be correct (the checksum computed over the
> data read from the disk matches the checksum stored on disk), or you
> get an I/O error.
On 27 Oct 2012 18:43 +0200, from mar...@lichtvoll.de (Martin Steigerwald):
> Possibly this could be done tabular as well, like:
>
> vdb vdc vdd
> Data, RAID 0 307,25MB307,25MB307,25MB
> …
> System,RAID1 - 8MB
3.6.3-3.fc18.x86_64.debug
btrfs-progs-0.20.rc1.20121017git91d9eec-1.fc18.x86_64
I'm getting a very different result with this kernel compared to 3.6.2, when I
do the same thing. I fill the btrfs volume to 97% full again, no errors. Add a
device of the *same* size, and then device delete.
In thi
On Oct 26, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
> So back to the original question, I'd suggest NOT to use either
> send/receive or set-default. Instead, setup multiple boot environment
> (e.g. old version, current version) and let user choose which one to
> boot using a menu.
Is it pos
Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2012 schrieb Goffredo Baroncelli:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a new attempt to improve the output of the command "btrfs fi
> df".
>
> The previous attempt received a good reception. However there was no a
> general consensus about the wording.
>
> Moreover I still didn't und
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:58 PM, cwillu wrote:
>
> I'd argue that everything should be absolute references to subvolumes
> (/@home, /@, etc), and neither set-default nor subvolume id's should
> be touched.
grub's core.img prefix is relative to the current default subvolume. I'm
unaware of an abs
On Oct 25, 2012, at 9:36 PM, cwillu wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> So what's the intended distinction between 'fi df' and 'fi show'? Because
>> for months using btrfs I'd constantly be confused which command was going to
>> show me what information I wanted,
Remove an invalid size check up from btrfs_shrink_dev().
The new size should not larger than the device->total_bytes as it was
already verified before coming to here(i.e. new_size < old_size).
Remove invalid check up for btrfs_shrink_dev().
Signed-off-by: Jie Liu
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c |2
This feature works on our crucial write endio path, so if we've got
lots of fragments to process, it will be kind of a disaster to the
performance, so I make such a change.
One can benifit from it while mounting with '-o snap_aware_defrag'.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |1 +
f
This comes from one of btrfs's project ideas,
As we defragment files, we break any sharing from other snapshots.
The balancing code will preserve the sharing, and defrag needs to grow this
as well.
Now we're able to fill the blank with this patch, in which we make full use of
backref walking stuff
15 matches
Mail list logo