[PATCH 0/5] add tree format display for btrfs subvol list subcommand

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com This will add new option -x to the btrfs subvol list sub-command to display subvol-snapshot relation in tree format with appropriate indentation. Anand Jain (5): Btrfs-progs: add parent uuid for snapshots Btrfs-progs: maintain similar case in heading

[PATCH 1/5] Btrfs-progs: add parent uuid for snapshots

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com --- btrfs-list.c | 32 +++- btrfs-list.h |1 + cmds-subvolume.c |6 +- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/btrfs-list.c

[PATCH 2/5] Btrfs-progs: maintain similar case in heading prefix

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com A trivial fix before this patch btrfs su list -qu /btrfs ID 256 gen 35 top level 5 parent UUID - uuid 60e54c4a-8136-3c43-a107-ea42052c6240 path sv1 ID 257 gen 35 top level 5 parent UUID 60e54c4a-8136-3c43-a107-ea42052c6240 uuid

[PATCH 3/5] Btrfs-progs: Move printing outside of btrfs_list_subvols

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com its better to have btrfs_list_subvols just return witout printing so that btrfs_list_subvols can be reused. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com --- btrfs-list.c | 28 ++-- btrfs-list.h |2 +-

[PATCH 4/5] Btrfs-progs: make provision to print subvol list tree format

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com Currently we have default (name value) and table format to list the subvol. This patch will help to accommodate the enhancement to provide the tree display for the subvol-snapshot list. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com --- btrfs-list.c |

[PATCH 5/5] Btrfs-progs: Add -x option to btrfs subvol list to display snapshots in tree format

From: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com This will add new option -x to the btrfs subvol list sub-command to display the snapshots under its parent subvol with appropriate indentation. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com --- btrfs-list.c | 135

Kernel lockdep WARNING on btrfs-next

I've been testing Josef's btrfs-next master branch using a test that loops through creation, manipulation and destruction of snapshots of kernel git sources. The version of btrfs-next I'm using was built as of Friday, December 14th, and the top commit is: Btrfs: don't take inode delalloc mutex if

Re: segmentation-fault in btrfsck (git-version)

Hello Mitch, hello all, Since btrfs has significant improvements and fixes in each kernel release, and since very few of these changes are backported, it is recommended to use the latest kernels available. Ok, it's 3.7 now. The root ### inode # errors 400 are an indication that there

Re: segmentation-fault in btrfsck (git-version)

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Hendrik Friedel hend...@friedels.name wrote: Hello Mitch, hello all, Since btrfs has significant improvements and fixes in each kernel release, and since very few of these changes are backported, it is recommended to use the latest kernels available. Ok,

Intel 120G SSD write performance with 3.2.0-4-amd64

I've got a system running Debian kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64 with root on a SSD that identifies itself as INTEL SSDSC2CT12 300i (it's an Intel 120G device). Here is the /proc/mounts entry which shows that ssd and discard options are enabled. /dev/disk/by-uuid/7939c405-c656-4e85-a6a0-29f17be09585 /

Re: Intel 120G SSD write performance with 3.2.0-4-amd64

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Russell Coker russell+bt...@coker.com.au wrote: I've got a system running Debian kernel 3.2.0-4-amd64 with root on a SSD that identifies itself as INTEL SSDSC2CT12 300i (it's an Intel 120G device). 3.2 is massively old in btrfs terms, with lots of fun little