On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:28 AM, Wang Shilong
wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
If there is no balance in progress, resume/pause/cancel
will return 2. Usage or syntax errors will return 1.
And 0 means operations return successfully.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
Hello,
I'm just answering my own message because I'm in the process of recreating the
filesystem. I just wanted to ask if this behavior is expected because there
still is no scrub support for raid5 or if I can give you some input to
identify a bug or test something?
Regards,
Tim
Am Dienstag,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 09/08/2013 12:15 AM, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin a3at.m...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
On 09/08/2013 12:15 AM, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin a3at.m...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
With 1 gig btrfs defaults to mixed block groups, so we ENOSPC in this test
because we run out of metadata space, not data space. Increasing to 2g allows
us to use our normal setup and allows us to pass this test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
---
tests/generic/274 |
For crc32c you can use this one which is lgpl:
https://github.com/sahlberg/libiscsi/blob/master/lib/crc32c.c
You can use the generator at :
http://www.ross.net/crc/download/crc_v3.txt
to generate this (and others)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:50 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:36:55AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:47:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:44:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:48:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at
From: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
raid5 and raid6 at least need three and four devices
respectively, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:47:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:44:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:48:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 09:02:07AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
This won't work, try having
any idea about separating Btrfs' data and metadata to improve the security
of flash storage?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Wang Shilong wangshilong1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Wang Shilong wangsl.f...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
On 09/08/2013 12:15 AM, Azat Khuzhin wrote:
Signed-off-by: Azat Khuzhin a3at.m...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c |2 +-
1
On 9/10/13 11:56 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:36:55AM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:47:52AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 11:44:54AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:48:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig
David O'Riley posted on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:04:20 +0100 as excerpted:
I have been using ubuntu-gnome 13.04 for a couple of week with no issue.
After a power failure my system fails to boot, error in rootfs.
If I boot from a live CD and try to mount /dev/sda6 the system crashed.
I have
enzo ferrari posted on Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:34:28 + as excerpted:
any idea about separating Btrfs' data and metadata to improve the
security of flash storage?
I don't see that listed on the wiki features list yet, for either current
or planned features.
Btrfs does have an ssd mode
14 matches
Mail list logo