And yet again on 3.12-rc6.
Note the BTRFS critical (device sdd1): unable to find logical
7598242613674844160 len 4096 there; after that, the fs freezes and
system won't reboot; has to be power cycled.
[ 9138.478015] [ cut here ]
[ 9138.478039] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 22882
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:10:32PM +0900, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
And yet again on 3.12-rc6.
Looks like this can be reproduced reliable, can you show the steps here?
thanks,
-liubo
Note the BTRFS critical (device sdd1): unable to find logical
7598242613674844160 len 4096 there; after
Not really.
I'm running backup in a following way:
- rsync --inplace --delete -H ... from remote to local btrfs filesystem
- snapshot
- remove old snapshots
- repeat for a different server
While previously this system would hang every few days (oom, allocation
failures; see a different thread,
hello,
I'm running into btrfs-transaction hang issue with below call trace
from dmesg[1].
when this issue happens, all filesystem r/w access will be blocked and
no response in terminal. I'm using Ubuntu raring(linux 3.2 kernel)
64bit kernel as below:
Linux dpu-e6410 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP
Tomasz Chmielewski posted on Mon, 21 Oct 2013 13:36:44 +0900 as excerpted:
I'll do some more tests with lots of extents to see if it's
reproducible here as well.
Interestingly, I've generally had qgroups enabled here as well,
possibly on all of these systems. Could that be the culprit?
Yet another cleanup patch broke code for which no xfstest exists.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens sbehr...@giantdisaster.de
---
fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 11:57:25AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The closing parenthesis is in the wrong place. We want to check
sizeof(*arg-clone_sources) * arg-clone_sources_count instead of
sizeof(*arg-clone_sources * arg-clone_sources_count).
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:36:41PM +0800, david pu wrote:
I'm running into btrfs-transaction hang issue with below call trace
from dmesg[1].
when this issue happens, all filesystem r/w access will be blocked and
no response in terminal. I'm using Ubuntu raring(linux 3.2 kernel)
64bit kernel
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:10:32PM +0900, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Note the BTRFS critical (device sdd1): unable to find logical
7598242613674844160 len 4096 there; after that, the fs freezes and
system won't reboot; has to be power cycled.
From the first mail:
[67893.390592] BTRFS critical
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 11:33:56AM +0100, Phil Davis wrote:
I also found Robert Buhren reporting very similar issue back in April 2013:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/24795
If further information is needed, i'd be happy to help.
Please open bug at
On 10/20/2013 11:36 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I'll do some more tests with lots of extents to see if it's
reproducible here as well.
Interestingly, I've generally had qgroups enabled here as well,
possibly on all of these systems. Could that be the culprit?
Possibly.
Is there a reliable
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:13:33PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:41:38AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
As of now btrfs filesystem show reads directly from
disks. So sometimes output can be stale, mainly when
user wants to cross verify their operation like,
label or
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:37 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:36:41PM +0800, david pu wrote:
I'm running into btrfs-transaction hang issue with below call trace
from dmesg[1].
when this issue happens, all filesystem r/w access will be blocked and
no response
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails
when
it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix
and
passes
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a
little
longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
fix this just
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:03:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't
actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails
when
it should succeed
On 10/21/13 10:09 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:03:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't
actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where
On 10/21/13 10:14 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/21/13 10:09 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:03:10AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't
actually
the same. This is a test to
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I recently added a patch to avoid sending holes with btrfs send, but I screwed
it up by not sending a hole when we did a hole punch. This is an xfstest
version of the test I wrote to show that I had a bug and to verify I was
fixing
it properly. This
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
With 1 gig btrfs defaults to mixed block groups, so we ENOSPC in this test
because we run out of metadata space, not data space. Increasing to 2g allows
us to use our normal setup and allows us to pass this test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik
On 10/18/13 1:26 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
Btrfs had some issues with fsync()'ing directories and fsync()'ing after
renames. These three new tests cover the 3 different issues we were seeing.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
I'd prefer that you copy 311 to a new test w/
hi:
since RAID 5/6 code merged into Btrfs from 2013.2, no update and bug are
found in maillist? is any development plan with btrfs raid5? such as adjusting
stripe width、 reconstruction？
compared to md raid5 what is advantage in btrfs raid5 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW
what does this macro means?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In order
to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just wipefs
the device we're adding to make sure the device add will
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:53:42PM +0800, lilofile wrote:
BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW
what does this macro means?
A file with that attribute set will be modified in place, rather
than have extents CoWed when they're modified. This is the
implementation of the +C attribute.
Hugo.
--
===
I noticed this test was hanging because mkfs.ext4 wanted to make sure it was ok
to mkfs an entire device. We need -F so it doesn't ask this question. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
---
tests/btrfs/012 | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
transaction_kthread can periodically commit data and metedata to
disk,similarly btrfs_writepages can write data page to disk, in which situation
btrfs_writepages function is called? and i cannot find btrfs_writepages is
called in btrfs code? who can tell me?
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hi
I decided to try full defrag on my btrfs array today. Sadly the system
crashed after a few hours.
No data lost as far as I have seen after reboot and the filesystem is
mounted and seemingly ok now.
Any ideas?
Hardware:
CPU: Intel Xeon X3430
MB: Supermicro X8SI6-F
RAM: 16GB (4x4GB) Samsung
I've been periodically failing btrfs/003 because my box sometimes takes a little
longer to unregister the device when we remove it and so the output from btrfs
dev show doesn't match what we are wanting since it still sees the device. To
fix this just stat and sleep if we still see the device
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:53:17 +0200
David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 03:10:32PM +0900, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
Note the BTRFS critical (device sdd1): unable to find logical
7598242613674844160 len 4096 there; after that, the fs freezes and
system won't reboot;
On 10/21/13 12:52 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
There was a problem with send trying to overwrite a file that wasn't actually
the same. This is a test to check this particular case where receive fails
when
it should succeed properly. I tested this to verify it fails without my fix
and
passes
On 10/21/13 11:05 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
I noticed this test was hanging because mkfs.ext4 wanted to make sure it was
ok
to mkfs an entire device. We need -F so it doesn't ask this question.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jba...@fusionio.com
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen
On 10/21/13 10:53 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
We changed btrfs device add to check and see if there is an existing fs on the
device we are adding, so you now have to do -f if you want to do this. In
order
to get around checking to see if we have this version of btrfs-progs just
wipefs
the
When debugging ENOSPC issues, it's nice to be able to see which
reservations failed as well as the ones which succeeded.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c |7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c2013-10-21
struct kobj_attribute implements the baseline attribute functionality
that can be used all over the place. We should export the ops associated
with it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
lib/kobject.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/lib/kobject.c 2013-10-21
This adds a writeable attribute which describes the label.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 44
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c 2013-10-21 16:20:06.395804741 -0400
+++ b/fs/btrfs/sysfs.c
With the compat and compat-ro bits, it's possible for file systems to
exist that have features that aren't supported by the kernel's file system
implementation yet still be mountable.
This patch publishes read-only info on those features using a prefix:number
format, where the number is the bit
btrfs filesystem df output will show the size of the metadata space
and how much of it is used, and the user assumes that the difference
is all usable space. Since that's not actually the case due to the
global metadata reservation, we should provide the full picture to the
user.
This patch adds
This patch adds the ability to publish supported features to sysfs under
/sys/fs/btrfs/features.
The files are module-wide and export which features the kernel supports.
The content, for now, is just 0\n.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 44
Now that we have the feature name strings available in the kernel via
the sysfs attributes, we can use them for printing better failure
messages from the ioctl path.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 35 ++-
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c |
This patch adds per-super attributes to sysfs.
It doesn't publish any attributes yet, but does the proper lifetime
handling as well as the basic infrastructure to add new attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |2 ++
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |9 +
This patch adds the ability to change (set/clear) features while the file
system is mounted. A bitmask is added for each feature set for the
support to set and clear the bits. A message indicating which bit
has been set or cleared is issued when it's been changed and also when
permission or
This patch publishes information on which features are enabled in the
file system on a per-super basis. At this point, it only publishes
information on features supported by the file system implementation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 81
There are some feature bits that require no offline setup and can
be enabled online. I've only reviewed extended irefs, but there will
probably be more.
We introduce three new ioctls:
- BTRFS_IOC_GET_SUPPORTED_FEATURES: query the kernel for supported features.
- BTRFS_IOC_GET_FEATURES: query the
Now that we have the infrastructure for per-super attributes, we can
publish device membership in /sys/fs/btrfs/fsid/devices. The information
is published as symlinks to the block devices.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney je...@suse.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |1 +
fs/btrfs/sysfs.c | 32
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:20:16PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
Good point David. However it would be a rather radical behaviour change imho.
A radical step to prevent this practictly impossible but nasty bug to
happen :)
I think it should be a separate change if there are no objections
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 12:21 AM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 06:20:16PM +0100, Filipe David Manana wrote:
Good point David. However it would be a rather radical behaviour change imho.
A radical step to prevent this practictly impossible but nasty bug to
happen
transaction_kthread can periodically commit data and metedata to
disk,similarly btrfs_writepages can write data page to disk, in which
situation btrfs_writepages function is called? and i cannot find
btrfs_writepages is called in btrfs code? who can tell me?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
hi:
since RAID 5/6 code merged into Btrfs from 2013.2, no update and bug
are found in maillist? is any development plan with btrfs raid5? such
as adjusting stripe width、 reconstruction？
compared to md raid5 what is advantage in btrfs raid5 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
If you create a seed device with btrfstune and then try to add a small (32MB)
device to it, the kernel will oops and the attempt to add the device will
fail.
I have attached a transcript of the shell session that demonstrates this.
(This was generated by piping UML to tee and then cleaning up the
get_btrfs_mount is reusable function but it is printing
errors, this removes it. Here the parent function of
open_path_or_dev_mnt does print error msg on error.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
---
utils.c |6 ++
utils.h |1 +
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4
Originally, thinking was user will use mount point if the disk
is mounted. But thats not really true, actually user don't
(or shouldn't) care to check if disk mounted, so whether disk
is mounted/unmounted when disk path is specified it should work.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain anand.j...@oracle.com
On 10/21/13 10:44 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:13:33PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 11:41:38AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
As of now btrfs filesystem show reads directly from
disks. So sometimes output can be stale, mainly when
user wants to cross
53 matches
Mail list logo
